Leaderboard

Hello! I'm a male in my early forties. Father of one. Single and I'm realizing I need some people in my life that are interested in the pursuit of truth based on reason and evidence I discovered Stephan through a youtube video on gun control and started listening to the pod cast after that. The show has had a big impact on how I reason and how I perceive behaviour occurring around me and in society in general. Other interests are spending time in the outdoors, shooting sports, building/making things.

This was a scandal: So was this: This scandal went on for days: While this hack wrote no fewer than three articles on why eating steak and ketchup (an arch-scandal) makes you ineligible:

I'm not sure. When Stef interviewed a guy in an old-ish video named "How Adolf Hitler Destroyed Germany", they guy mentioned price controls and how that created massive shortages and overabundance. It's possible Hitler's policies were beneficial in the short-run, but with price controls his system is essentially just a smarter version of Socialism but still produces the same bad effects in the long run. Again I haven't listened to the video in a while and I'd recommend you give it a chance, but the idea that Germany was doing pretty good under Hitler, and would have stayed doing pretty good, contradicts the idea of price controls and Fascistic-style corporatism (which is to say, government paying businesses to produce X Y or Z instead of seizing it and attempting to do it themselves). Lol sounds a bit like what Trump's slowly doing, but in his case it's looking to be a temporary relief and one likely to crash to due the insanity over at the Federal Reserve and other things. Possibly similar as to why Hitler's economic policies, which I knew to include price controls and corporatism, were doomed to eventually crash. Slightly off topic but the fact he didn't make a family is also a big negative in the long run, as clearly the only way the NatSoc's were going to stick around peacefully was through hereditary dictatorship. True, but I don't that was helping them in the long run. I mean, have a lot of young fighting age guys essentially remain with that mindset without the taming benefits of family life and the added sociopathy that comes with the military life, and you have a recipe for disaster for reasons similar as to why the Brown Shirts where getting out of hand. Quite simply those that actually did and were provided for would raise children in that environment and over time it would grow either via gossip or simply via births in the program that would slowly poison the system. Besides hypothetically Adolf V Gustav in 2050 could use it as a campaign tool similarly to how the welfare state is used by Leftists. A whole lot of programs would need removing or modifying for long-term viability. The only part I really still think worked out was Albert Speer because he's pretty much the biggest genius among them--capable of both civilian work and keeping a massive war sustained. If a new group looking to build a White ethnostate had an Albert Speer they'd be golden as I'm sure he'd lay down the foundations (D.R.O.'s, C.D.A.'s, the stuff that'd replace State police and armies) for abdicating and abolishing government.

In these cases that's true, however it relies on the premise that the State is Jewish rather than simply a collection of monsters that happens to have an overrepresentation of Jews relative to their population. However in terms of the merchant selling, anything Statist is better analogized to a mafia 'offering'. That's something I've wondered as well. I have never known a dumb Jew but I also haven't known many Jews, as there aren't that many of them. I'm sure they're at least as high as the average White because...well, stupid people don't over-represent in their countries. However it is known there is a strong in-group preference among Jews, therefore I'm sure even slow Jews get ahead because they know somebody. And of course not all Jews are shysters, the main man behind modern AnCap is a Jew and Stefan Molyneux may be part Jewish himself, thereby "redeeming" them collectively as good Jews are making themselves more visible as if to "cancel out" the bad Jews. In general Jews have some of the best survival instincts and I imagine the reason why they're so over-represented in government and governmental-touched areas is because they're the safest areas to make the most bang and buck both individually and collectively, as most Jews have well-established families and kin-groups that help advance each other. Plus some Jewish sects tend to be pretty Islamic about their dogma and those sects in particular are very much the pro-self and anti-non-self racists.

That's quite the article, and a very strong argument. You know I was never taught anything about this in my government-sponsored public school education...I wonder why.

Theoretically AnCap would work best to undue control from undesirable groups because AnCap by it's own nature gives the most resources to the most K-selected, therefore r-selected adherents to degeneracy and its promoters (be they Jews or otherwise) would shrink over time. The most peaceful way to upgrade the White race is to let the bad Whites be bad (and suffer the consequences) and let the good Whites be good, 'cause Mother Nature is very fair insofar as she blesses with the most resources to the most K-selected among us. As far as porn is concerned, I think it's really a great benefit to humanity because it takes away a very powerful weapon from both women and men who use sex as a substitute for good character. Just think about it; if you can get the thrill of orgasm without risking an STD, rape case, etc. from having sex with a random crazy person, why not? By satisfying those urges manually we protect ourselves from being manipulated by evil and crazy people. It makes it easier for men and women to abstain from sex until they meet the great K selected people for whom sex ought to be given to as the best fit for furthering familial survival. Stefanism (peaceful parenting and RTR) is most easily followed when sex is taken out of the equation. Crazy women (from a man's side) stand out glaringly when men aren't being suffocated in hormones to overlook their crazy, and therefore sane women get the positive male attention. Vice versa also applies. In short; porn is wonderful; it promotes K-selection by disarming sexually attractive but dangerous demons!

Very strange in 2017 to be removing the chat functionality ...

You're retarded. Stop responding to me.

don't join in on the retardation. He has a problem with me and was being passive aggressive. I wasn't making an argument. I was making it clear I have no desire whatsoever to engage with him at this point. It's also why I've put him on ignore. Don't use #NotAnArgument unless you have bigboy panties on. You'll ruin it for the rest of us. Interesting how you didn't pick up on the passive aggression.

Then you know what to do. Get to it.

Claiming that I'm joining in on the "retardation" or that I don't wear "bigboy panties" is passive aggressive behaviour - indirect expression of hostility. You do not have the authority nor my respect to tell me what I can join in on or what phrases I cannot use - that's the kind of authoritarianism we fight against. Please note that your statements are also not arguments. You claim to "have no desire whatsoever to engage with [DaVinci]", yet you communicated to him using verbal abuse. Your logic has failed. If you're not going to communicate with him, why insult him then try to block him? I suspect it's because you knew your behaviour is inappropriate. You also claim "I wasn't making an argument" when you insulted DaVinci - then it is true that your statement was "not an argument" and people are correct to point this out to you. Here's where the problem originally started: You were dissatisfied with how neeeel was responding in his thread. You were first confused, then claim he wasn't putting effort into this thread, and finally claiming the short posts are a waste of time - all without defining: what you were confused about what constitutes "effort" why short posts are a waste of time This is neeels thread and if you're dissatisfied with it, you're impatience is not going to help neeeel communicate what is clearly a difficult subject for him - this is why DaVinci recommended you to leave and allow neeel to respond how he wants to. He was direct with you about the problem he had with you - that's quite the opposite of the passive aggression that you claim he was behaving like. He was being assertive with you - this does not give you the privilege of calling him names. Where is the freedom in Freedomain Radio in you're behaviour? I hope you take the time to understand my arguments - the evidence is clear.

Holy crap man get over yourself

Figure it out. I wasn't making one. You're not doing this right. Stop hijacking the thread. EDIT: You know what? If you actually want to have this conversation with me, then I will engage you over private message. Send me a message and I will respond to you there.

Finally you agree that you are not providing an argument. Congratulations, the first step in solving the problem is acknowledging the problem. This is a philosophy forum. Provide arguments, logic, reason, and facts - not verbal abuse, meaningless statements like "get over yourself", or telling other people what to do. Your user name (_LiveFree_) is an oxymoron - it's a self-contradictory effect when you tell others how to live. Funny because it reminds me of a 90's movie called "I Come In Peace" where the villain would say "I come in peace" to make people drop their guard just before he proceeded to kill them. I guess peace for the villain meant death to others. What is "this" and how do we determine "doing...right"? You're building the case against you being capable of practising philosophy. Just because you say it is doesn't make it so. Again, where's your argument? You hijacked neeeel's thread when you started to complain about his short posts and that he was apparently wasting time. I'm here to show you, and others who will see this in the future, of your insulting behaviour towards others here including how you ignore evidence with even more insults! No. Calling people "retards" and ordering them what to do in a public arena only makes me wonder how you will behave with the doors closed. You want to hide the evidence and logic supporting your abusive and insulting behaviour. Let's be transparent to Neeeel and others by showing the world how _LiveFree_ reacts when an argument with empirical evidence is built against you. I've done some homework. You have a trend of being certain about how others ought to behave while failing to take your own advice. Here's what you said regarding newspeak on April 27, 2017 in this thread: Here's what you said about philosophy on May 8, 2017 in this thread: The following is your statement supporting your hypocrisy regarding the proper use of "not an argument": So you're telling me that when you call some one a "retard" and I point out that it's not an argument, you think you have the credibility to correct me that I'm doing it wrong. You have little to no integrity and are clearly hypocritical. I hope these posts help shine some light on who _LiveFree_ is, so that when some one like neeeel is sharing something personal and difficult, that they recognize having a discussion with some one like _LiveFree_ is not a safe person. I recommend seeking out a good professional therapist who is trained to provide safe interactions within a safe place.