Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/19/2017 in all areas

  1. Lol I have been called verbose before... My writing? Let's just say I know a guy, and he's really into my ideas, and when that guy publishes the novel he's been spending five years on since middle school, I'll be the first to share it on FDR to both generate feedback and funds for this good friend of mine. Quite simply, you have to change your mindset. I used to be a radical Leftist back when I was first exposed to it in early high school (note: I am 19, so I was 14-15 when I was a Leftist) and therefore know what kinds of "the means are always justified by the ends" kinds of guys they really are, and know what kind of childhoods they've had and what their real motivations for being virtue-signalling Redshirts are. Like I said I've been writing for a long time, pretty much ever since I got bored in middle school 'cause I'd always finish my assignments quickly then retreat to the caverns of my imagination until the bell rang. I don't know how or why I'm good at coming up with ideas for film and literature, I just am, and I'm heavily inspired by a lot of things ranging from the Stefpai to my old dogmas to Objectivism, to my own personal fantasies as a troubled kid. I've always been an outcast (at least until I started self-knowledge and all that) and am therefore immune to peer ostracism or non-productive criticism, unless it comes from someone I highly respect and consider an authority it some way. If I were to hypothetically write something with deep Rightist themes, I'd start off humble but once I became famous for it I'd follow the new path of self-publishing and self-promoting. Traditional publishing is a good way to get famous; modern self-publishing is a good way to both make good money and make a positive impact on the world. We'll see if my friend does or not, we're both eagerly doing our utmost to ensure it's well-written and has what I intend to be the point at the forefront rather than something unintended. Conserva-cool for my generation is men marching in the streets chanting "Die Islam; Viva Europa". We're highly cynical of the elders that screwed us over and am hungry for violent change to both secure for ourselves a future and spite the parasites. However we're not all in agreement about what to do after that; we stand the risk of repeating the mistakes of the past and becoming the new Fascists or Communists (what's the difference, really). That's why my friend want's to make sure people have Stefanist principles in mind before they start going crazy and doing radical things that may or may not affect change for the better. We're hot and angry, but we're not wise nor tempered. To some degree I sympathize; I was always K-selected but I had Leftist ideals, I was odd amongst the Leftists I knew because of this. Eventually when I stopped holding my ears and wishing for a Papa Stalin to save the day, I grew up and became a blank-slate Nationalist, then NatCap, then AnCap. I still have growing to do, but I think I've made the most radical changes in my personal view of the world and political beliefs I am ever going to have already. That, to some degree, is the attitude. But attitude must be met with meat. Why is a philosopher putting his hand in front of the mob cool? Because it shows his bravery and integrity; Joan of Arc is famous and beloved because she martyred herself for France, her courage and love of the French people and the Catholic Church being her (at least from what I know) guiding principles. Likewise peaceful parenting and the deep connections between good parents and children, as well as good spouses with each other, are very "cool" when explored in depth for how great they can be. Imagine if you were a child of a single mom without a good personal role model; wouldn't you love to see what it'd be like for a man with integrity and foresight to be your guiding father, and a woman with empathy and wisdom to be your guiding mother? Imagine if you were a young adult, around my age, in this environment where it seems like all girls are trash and all guys are idiots; wouldn't you love to see an alternative where the wise and K-selected do what they do best? Wouldn't you be warned, if you were not so wise, if you saw what happens from the spectator's seat what the r-selected do and what kind of families they produce? And at the end of it all, the good K-selected reign supreme for their unity, values, and foresight? These ideas, and the hunger for these ideas, as well as creation into reality of these ideas, are very powerful and I am certain that, like Paul Joseph Watson said, Conservatism is the the new punk. Rightism and K-selection is the new ideal to counter the disgusting hypocrisy of the r-selected mob-ruled State. EDIT: Heck, study Hitler for how to make counterculture cool. Hans Westmar deified Horst Wessel and made the guy dying for the cause of Nationalism against Communism cool; his speeches often spoke for public charities and the building of strong families; and his goons were made of guys fed up with Socialism and the fragmented family. While they certainly failed royally in solving these problems (I don't need to explain how they failed; persecuting Jews and WWII being the big easy pointers with their slightly altered Communism being the more subtle one) they succeeded in rallying people against the problems and doing something about them. Their films, though old, were pretty good. I watched Hans Westmar back when I used to think this was a good idea, and enjoyed it very much for the human drama of the guy who was raised well and risks himself for his people. While the true story isn't so noble, the principles were there and I enjoyed it. The bad guys know how to make their ideas popular; I'm not suggesting nor doing anything new in saying how to make Rightism and K-selection popular, I just happen to know how the bad guys and old good guys did it.
    1 point
  2. Maybe it's because I'm K-selected, but I don't find them to be at all fun incentives, and I've grown up in a very Leftist berg. Perhaps Easy Rider mainly only appealed to the r-selected of the times? We have Antifa, the Red Guard, the SJW, the Divorce Corps, etc. It's not hard to invent fictional villains based on real ones. According to Wikipedia the move ends with rednecks killing the heroes; an easy parallel would be Antifa stormtroopers singing the Internationale while napalming the protagonists. I doubt any viewers will be sympathetic of the Leftists when their terrorist wings are publicized on cinema and are used as the cause for the hero's downfall. Heck if I were a film writer I'd make a character duo like Stef and Mike the main characters, using the framework of Easy Rider made Rightist. Basically the Philosopher Kings would be a pair of activists seeking to be both the figurative and literal man shouting in front of and against the mob, seeking to prevent an otherwise imminent danger. Easy: the plague of Statism; degeneracy; Lefitst violence; political violence in general; the "Hard men create soft times; soft times create soft men; soft men create hard times; hard times create hard men" cycle; peaceful parenting; individualism (i.e. praising the merits of the great individuals who do XY or Z to save the A from the threat of B, by creating or doing C.); Nationalism as opposed to Globalism; Racial realism as opposed to racial "blindness"; Antifa compared to the Sons of Odin (or some other modern Right Wing protection group); etc. There is a bounty of wealth for ideas to be found on the Right that is far more intellectually and humanly stimulating than the hedonism and cynicism of the Left. I don't mean to put down, perhaps the ideas come easy to me because it's what I am currently doing as a novelist, but I'm frankly surprised so few people of my generation (late 90's early 2000's born) and earlier have been able to come up with interesting and enjoyable bits of culture with these themes. I dunno because the Wikipedia doesn't mention any violence being used to transport the drugs. The heroes may be degenerate but they aren't "evil". If I wanted to portray Leftist evils I'd focus on their hypocrisy, "political flexibility", and their love of violence and their dark childhoods. I'd totally make a portrait of evil out of them using the very real facts we know about them in contrast to the generally good-natured and far-sighted Rightists, Libertarians, and Conservatives, with the Stefpai and Mike being my templates for the "ideal Right Wing Hero".
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.