Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/25/2018 in all areas

  1. Makes me seethe that the Police will readily perform such a ploy - the ultimate corruption. I would have liked William Becker to not have missuse the term 'anarchists' to describe the lawless thugs. Anarchism is just where there is an absence of rulers. That does not mean there is an absence of law. The violent thugs certainly took advantage of the momentary and clearly calculated absence of ruler lackeys (the police) but that does not make the thugs anarchists in the proper sense of the word. If there were no rulers the victims of the thug's predations would have been able to defend themselves and, the knowledge of that probability, the attack would likely not have occurred.
    1 point
  2. No way would I want to be someone's property. That's why I'm a loner so that I can retain my freedom. I've spent most of my life being pushed around by people, particularly "loved ones," and I fought hard to escape. If I wanted to live like I'm owned by someone, then I'd return to Queen Mother and her minions my older siblings, which is something I don't want to do. If that offends so people, well that's too bad. It's funny how the biggest control freaks are the ones who wouldn't want to be treated in such a way themselves, yet have no qualms about dominating others. Why should I care about their feelings when they don't care about mine?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.