Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/14/2018 in all areas
-
Would you say that hitting someone who taunts you with name-calling can be moral self-defense or would it be excessive self-defense in violation of the NAP?-1 points
-
If you don't subscribe to the NAP then I don't think this question is for you. By "free society" I mean an an-cap society in which the NAP and property rights are the only rules.-1 points
-
I don't think blackmail is aggression because it's just talking and deal-making. Aggression is when you physically attack someone or violate someone's property rights. I think fraud is also a violation of property rights. Blackmail is basically an agreement to keep a secret in exchange for money. If the blackmailer accepts money and then reveals the secret, then he is committing fraud. Otherwise, I don't see how he is doing anything immoral.-1 points
-
I disagree with your premise. I don't want to frame blackmail as non-aggression. It's like asking me why I'm gay. I'm not gay, so I can't answer that question. If you're asking why I'm asking about blackmail in the first place, it's because blackmail is an issue that seems to be mitigated by law in a state, but I don't see how blackmail could be stopped in an an-cap society because it doesn't violate the NAP.-1 points
-
You lost me. Maybe I'm the dummy here, but nothing of what you said made any sense to me. Were you smoking some green marijuana when you made that post?-1 points