Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/11/2018 in all areas

  1. ticketyboo The above medical study was just one example of the TREND in medical studies to consider sex, race, and ethnicity as a potential risk factor in a particular disease/procedure outcome. Many disease are caused by several factors (multifactorial) and in the study the statistical expression is often called a risk factor. For example if you have a risk factor of 2 this means you will have twice the chance of getting the disease compared to someone who does not have that risk factor. In the vast majority of cases SES (social economic status) and education are risk factors the authors look at. It has been my thesis that poverty (low SES) and lack of education are correlative factors (they are symptoms not causal) and that IQ is the most likely causative factor. My original entry (rant) covered this topic in some detail. To reiterate, IQ is never considered and therein lies the rub. The medical community is scared shitless, to be crude, to consider IQ. Often the conclusion of these medical studies is to suggest poverty and poor education opportunity are a major risk factors and that more money be spent on governmental health assist programs and better educational choices will improve outcomes.. That advice is often misguided and counterproductive. I have been contacting the medical community to include IQ in their studies. As of todate, I have not received and feedback, pro or con, on my suggestion. This was one of the reasons I turned to the Freedomain community for help and suggestions. DATAGUY
    1 point
  2. "downvoted"? I guess I should look for some operating instructions.
    1 point
  3. Hi voter, Thanks for your interest and the new views also. So you downvoted this (after I got responded to it) : ->with : "I don 't really know how it relates to philosophy, but I asked first in the General section, and received an answer that it should probably go in Philosophy ." Running out of ideas, huh?...Hahaha Thanks for brightening up my day!
    -1 points
  4. to the current ' zeitgeist ' /12-08-2018/ Hi voter, Absolutely, thanks for the demonstration. (You nailed my meaning, well done!)
    -1 points
  5. @dataguy Old boys club. Collectivist mindset. You can't play by their rules, which are contradictory. What to do, not really sure, a lot of thoughts come to mind...., productive action other than what Stefan is doing??? Some coordination might be helpful. For the most part I don't think it is intentional, but unconscious. Whats annoying sometimes is when collectivists contradict themselves within the same sentence or paragraph. Like with the concentration camps, killing individuals. Cubans, Boers and Europeans. None of my relatives were killed, not that I have that many. Had a grandfather POW(was a pilot), that was going to be shipped to the gas chambers at Leipzig before the train tracks were bombed by the RAF. Was interesting reading his diary that the behaviour of the station attendants was similar("friendly"), as described in a similar situation "Mans Search for Meaning" Vicktor Frankl, though the people weren't as fortunate, pretty horrific reading the book.
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.