Formelyknown

If your monopoly of aggression is restraining. What if an individual doesn`t like your monopoly and form another government? If yes it is restraining, then how the hell can you tell me it is a monopoly and if there is No restrain in this situation then it stop to be peaceful. Therefore a contradiction and we should reject the question.

A follow up on the debate: Near the end they talk about stefan's mulgenerational aproach. They both agree it is a bad idea.

Hello, This is a videogame I worked on in the past.The guy I worked for try to kickstart it. If you help this project. It could help me as a stay at home Dad with my 2 year old son. It is a space combat game with some RTS elements. http://www.virtuadv.com/ksshare.htm Thank you

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4_u7veGPA0

Sorry, didn't find any english video. Stefan, if you want to open some eyes in quebec. Now is your chance to make a video. Maybe you will need some french subtitle if you make a video about it.

He doesn't talk about shooting governement agent just because he is working for the state. He present the case once the idea of the nap gain the critical mass localy. If the federal goons try to arrest you for a victimeless crime wouldn't be time to draw the line in the sand by exercice your right to self defence.

Chris Cantwell is not welcome to the free-state project because he said that someday, we'll have to shoot a cop to gain our freedom. He is asking to Stefan to see if his arguments is good or not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mw9xJJCFp6o

I would start your introduction with something like: If I put a sandwich in your mouth and ask you to pay me and you believe I have no right to force you to pay. You already agreeing to the conclusion of this thesis.

Frankly I don`t see anything wrong with his approach. If human is part of the observable universe. It is making perfect sens to suggest we could also observe what constitute or what bring human to come up with values to follows. Maybe the flaw it is that he need to explain what constitute a human. Why a sociopath or psychopath can`t be part of the human experience? Isn`t that the same as the majority make the rules? Why having a wider spectrum of emotion depth, empathy is better then less?

Recent News: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz1j4IHcsP4 Radiation level in the pacific ocean: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PrhG5gmVb8 What happened: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMaEjEWL6PU

TEDxMileHighSalon - Michael Huemer - The Irrationality of Politicshttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JYL5VUe5NQ

The best way to defend libertarianism is not through economic arguments; nor appeals to general, abstract theories about the nature of morality; nor through the non-aggression axiom. The best way to defend libertarianism is through appeal to common sense morality. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmCn2vP-DEo

You can't prove that "God doesn't exist" is faith, because you didn't prove it wasn't true. See you are an irrational faithish dogmatic fool.

How do you proceed and what are the criterias? Does the invisible apple no one can touch, smell, taste or see on all known spectrum next to me exist?

In a series of startling studies, psychologists at the University of California at Berkeley have found that "upper-class individuals behave more unethically than lower-class individuals." Ongoing research is trying to find out what it is about wealth — or lack of it — that makes people behave they way they do.

Is there a time or a place we can say something doesn't exist?

It is not about Murphy himself. If i share the same idea then a crazy guy. I think it is a good idea to make sure I 'm not insane for sharing the same conclusions.

After reading his articles on his site I'm starting to look if there is something wrong with me when it come to my knowledge about the free-market. It is like murphy want to sabotage austrian economy when he talk about atheism and science.

[View:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic20MS58TkE]

I would say that self-esteem is the involontary emotional response to our own confidence of our abilities.

It isn't about compromise. One say the taxes do X and I show it doesn't. I don't care to pay 50% of my income if it does what is suppose to do. If they want to make me and themselves slaves of a system be right about it. That an ancap or statist are wounded doesn't change reality of the situation.

It isn't only annoyances. Those are fundamental issues. I can't build the house I want for less then 10000$ but stuck to buy a 350 000$ house or be slave to a guy renting me a room. Ironically it is what socialist /communist are scared off and why they hate free-market. Furthemore the gov took money from me and others not because I need it but the system does. Because a guy in the governement want to keep his job. If the average joe doesn't care about that. The problem is not liberty but the guy who think it's normal.

I once lost my job and saw how the system screwed me. I couldn't just take the money I saved, find an empty spot and put down a little shed with a garden while finding a new job or start my business by using wifi in a cofee shop. Nope. I had to fill a bunch of papers to prove I had rent to pay. I had to put enough money on the side to pay for my income taxes as an autonmous worker. So that I can prove I deserved the money I owe because of the government's regulation and taxes which supposed to pay for my safety net. Furthemore I owed some money after I found a new job, because I did the awful crime of taking my retirement money to pay some debts. Social security is so awesome.