Jump to content

fractional slacker

Member
  • Posts

    570
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by fractional slacker

  1. I am sorry to hear your parents were shitty to you as a child. If they were abusive, you had every right to retaliate. They are responsible for your success, not the other way around. I hope you find a way to reconnect with yourself, and others.

    Would it be "cyber bullying" to point out this woman made her name performing voluntary sexual favors on a married man?

     

    Would it be "cyber bullying" to point out Ms. Lewinsky has parlayed that "mistake" into a career of spouting the virtues of victimhood?

    Would it be "cyber bullying" to point out her political parasite married boyfriend decided to lob a few cruise missiles at an aspirin factory to try and distract the press from this whole tawdry mess Ms. Lewinsky and Billy boy got themselves into?  

     

    Would it be "cyber bullying" to criticize Ms. Lewinsky and her fellow SJW cohorts who prefer to cloak censorship by playing the victim card for consensual relations?

    • Upvote 2
  2. It's the matrix of language, yes?  Climate denier.  Check your privilege. Anti racist. Where the accusation is as good as evidence.

    There is considerable backlash against Starbucks from the left on this issue which is rather telling. Because folks talking might threaten the whole racial tension industry. Hello MRM.

     

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/03/19/why-starbucks-chief-howard-schultz-put-himself-at-the-center-of-americas-race-debate/?wprss=rss_business

  3. This one hits home. I have a friend that attempts to claim driving a car is, while very minor in degree, a violation of the NAP against future generations. My friend is a "climate change" evangelist. It causes strife between us.

     

    Sorry, I haven't read the entire thread and someone may have already brought this up.

    I reject the poison pill of pollution invalidating the NAP.  This argument is basically the secular version of original sin. If you consider life as optional, then yes you could argue pollution is aggression. If you are a misanthropic nihilist, arguing about the sin of pollution is your attempt to justify spreading misery.

  4. From the geniuses who brought us the "ban bossy" campaign we have another "moral" obligation decree. According for Sheryl Sandberg, men can improve their plight by supporting the women around them.

     

    “From stronger marriages and healthier, happier children to better outcomes at work, the benefits of men leaning in for equality are huge.”

    I know Stef has mentioned this before. Anyone have male/female stats for the following: workplace deaths, military deaths, suicide, alimony, prison inmates, college enrollment, forced medication of school children by gender?  
    After all, if we can only save one woman/girl, it is worth it, yes? :(

     

    http://ftw.usatoday.com/2015/03/sheryl-sandberg-nba

    • Upvote 1
  5. This quasi legalization is a bureaucrats dream and a consumer's nightmare as ETU hinted at in earlier post. It gives unproductive folk AKA govt. a reason to exist. Think of how many rules and brow beating we currently endure with "legal" alcohol.  "Legal" weed means the political parasites have another excuse to micromanage every aspect of your life for "your protection."
    They will call it responsible use.  The reality is you must bow to their every whim to enjoy your freedom privilege while paying them extortion money they will call taxes. 

  6. "Sounds like a preacher to me."

    agree

    "I'm not convinced about NVC myself, as it can lead to a kind of moral relativism imo."

    agree

     

    This video makes me uncomfortable as I perceive it on some level as endorsing parts of Buddhism and promoting a pollyanna stance. Neither one of those ideas are a threat to TPTB in my opinion.

  7. As I understand it, UPB is applicable to beings that can comprehend and understand UPB. Exactly when and what age that happens is impossible to say. Since one cannot prove a fraudulent claim in regards to an older person having sex with a younger person, I don't think UPB would always condemn such a practice. There is not automatically a violation of UPB because of an age difference.
    Age disparity would fall under APB: aesthetically preferable behavior.

  8. "The question is what does philosophy have to say in regards to waiting until after marriage to have sex?"

     

    I think discovering something true with that question could benefit from some philosophical arguments, but not as an abstract. Without circumstances and details, philosophy could not add much.

  9. That whole paragraph is argument by adjective and assertion, and which has already been pointed out: it's dozens of conclusions about dozens of subjects. There is no rational discourse going on.
     

    The first sentence starts with propaganda by using the adjective true to describe communism. Communism is an inconsistent and contradictory method for organization because it denies self ownership and property rights for everyone except the ruling class.

    • Upvote 2
  10. (^ not sure what the previous vid has to do with Chomsky)

    Even if Chomsky had something brilliant to say, his style of communicating is a like running your fist over a cheese grater.  BTW, I also found the late William Buckley to be similar.

     

    It's a shame in a sense as the guy is obviously very intelligent. But when you have a captive audience (college kids), your incentives to adapt to the market is removed. It's no wonder the guy hates capitalism.

  11. ^^ Is Venezuela on the Verge of Collapse?

     

    Found that to be one of the best current articles on the continuing hostage situation going on in Venezuela. It's hard to imagine having money AND not being able to buy basic items such as cooking oil or diapers. The measures the govt. mafia keep putting in place to fix supply problem are not fooling anyone. 
    Maybe we are just in the fish bowl, but I am still amazed you can't hardly find anyone on the street who knows anything about the crisis developing in this oil-rich country. SMH

  12. Was $175 US couple of hours ago (now $195). From what I have read the price is depressed from, well basically too many folks converting bitcoin to fiat.

    From what I understand, while transactions are increasing, merchants ain't holding. As soon as they get bitcoin, they convert it to fiat. Miners are also in a pickle as production costs are at or on verge of being higher than market price forcing them to sell coins ASAP.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.