Thanks for your post. Ron Paul and Molyneux are excellent at making logical points but I wonder about their effectuality. Actually, I would argue that Paul has made more of an impact than Molyneux by working within the state even though the latter is the more effective speaker. I think there is also something to be said about Hagel here and that is - we live in a particular kind of world, a society where the message "smash the state" resonates with very few unless its done with respect to the various socially accepted constructs that (and we must grant them atl least this) have gained their merit through historical pedigree. I would also argue that we will find that these free state projects will have a profound effect on changing such statist oriented constructs for the better and people in this community and others related to it should get behind them and try to work with them. Nevertheless, logic is logic and Molyneux, Ron Paul and yourself cannot be said to be wrong. Unfortunately, however, we live in a world that is.
You are absolutly right and I will. Thanks
Those are some excellent fuckin' questions. Let me go get a bottle of wine. I'll get backed to you in a little while.