Zangetshumody

I'm trying to develop a science of diagnosing and treating persona-viruses. The basic idea goes something like this: Life is essentially meaningless, this gives us the opportunity to make of life, whatever we will. And so when life is marked by trauma, there is some belief set-up that we have been ensnared by that traps us in a particular struggle that keeps on generating consequences due to our filtering of experience through the belief set-up. There are some books which dicuss this stuff, where these belief set-ups are called contracts, where parts of the scope of your intention (or 'soul') are repressed as they will not submit to the consequence of the contract (aka the trauma). A lot of the repressed soul stuff is just a folklore interpretation of the motions of the subconscious;- the latent awareness of the individual that needs expression through 'gut feelings' (as just one example) is the mark of repression, or unintegrated awareness with the incompatiable ego-consciousness. I've went to a Sangoma (African Shaman), and I was able to discern my contract with recourse to traveling into my subconscious through aided meditation. This was very interesting to me, because it put my persona-virus diagnosis into context... Contract: Everyone should care for me. Trap: Justice-help. Trauma: lack of attention, love and care. Struggle: judging other people's greed in terms of their non-compliance with my contract. (his suggested treatment): just finish what you start. (below is a diagnoses of my persona-virus in terms of my Metagram theory) Flow chart (traveling down): Description: Primal desire (borne from the want experienced by lacking the specific content of the primal gap) [urges&darr] Wanting thoughts about how I think things are that would permit me to be elated/worried regarding my intellectualization of ‘why things ought to be [a certain way]’ Imaginary true character (an imaginary substitution of a natural self with a pretend character designed to induce exchanges that produce the primal gap) [incurs&darr] Imagining feelings about how things ought to be so that I’m confused/annoyed regarding my reasoning of ‘how things shall be’ Temptation (an alluring predicament that seduces the imagined sense of self) [urges&darr] Lured by beliefs about why things are the way they are which would allow me to be angry regarding my opinion of ‘why things are a certain way’ Gratification (when temptation is acted upon, the imaginary character is gratified; and the primal desire is unfulfilled) [incurs&darr] Gratified by beliefs about what ought to be so that I’m angry regarding my intellectualization of ‘why things ought to be [a certain way]’ Repercussion (the consequence one undergoes when the gratification is undertaken and primal desire frustrated) [urges&darr] Undergoing feelings about reality (what things are) which would make me confused/annoyed regarding my notion of ‘what will be’ Death (response of resistance towards the temptation with the outlook of revoking the repercussion; seems so hollow because it doesn’t appease the imaginary character or the primal desire [which incurs its persistence]) Undertaking thoughts about why things ought to be [a certain way] so that I’m elated/worried regarding my opinion of ‘why things are a certain way’ I'm not sure yet how I'm going to marry these inputs (the contract to the diagnoses), in my theory there are 48 types of viruses, all in all containing 72 possible specific processes... well, just thought Id share where I am with my personal development in the attempt to reclaim my life from kharma and false ego.....

------------------------------contains a spoiler------------------------------ I enjoyed the video, I think the point you made was clearly transmitted, I don't know if you wished to discuss its substance, in case you did, let me offer my thoughts on the substance you raised-- Apart from all the metaphorical descriptions of hell, isn't it just supposed to be a place where one is seperated from God (or where God is abscent)? I don't really believe such a place exists, I just think, to make it consistent with your principle, if you reject God/love and somehow manage to be alive in a place devoid of God/love (I dont think this is possible), then the only sex that exists would be rape, in some or other fashion, as without God there is no light upon which any state of being imbued with volition can subsist (derrived from the Good's divine luminosity). "I am that I am" is the true nature of your character, so without a sense of "I am that I am", how can one exist and still be termed 'life'? In keeping with what I stated above, isn't hell just the description of the absurd proposition of wishing to move away from God, taken to the extreme in which one is deprived of sensing any aspect of "I am that I am", which has within it the promise to grow and be present in keeping with the spirit of "I shall prove to be what I shall prove to be" (which was the first thing "God" answered Moses, when wanting to impart his name), as without access to this over-arching spiritual content, we are a hollow core lost in an abyss.

I have a personal contention that whenever it is stated that it is God who speaks directly, he is talking through Michael, as God can conceivablely not act independently within the sum image of creation without there being an apparent image body to be identified as an agent, and as agents might be capable of binding the principle, they do not share the same identity. It is often said we can only know the father through the son, it makes sense that the unfathomable creation of the only begotten son, who was the first thing in creation (and only thing that was directly created by God (everything else being created THROUGH the only beggetton son (this is plainly stated in John chapter 1)). So to me it makes sense, that the son was Michael, and then michael crafted the other arch angels, and together they make up the Elohim (which is often translated as God in Gensis, but this word is hebrew, and it is in a plural form (meaning the plural of majesty)):- so it would appear that Michael put himself on equal footing with his arch angel creations, all though it seems Michael's words and actions are attributable to God (well, that's my contention).