Wuzzums
-
Posts
1,239 -
Joined
-
Days Won
38
Posts posted by Wuzzums
-
-
Nope.
The call-in shows are the essence of FDR and there's not anything like it elsewhere. Most other podcasts of the like pick a topic then pic people to talk about it. Stefan picks people then the people pick what they want to talk about. Stefan tries to understand the person before addressing their question which in most cases leads to common ground. I haven't seen anyone else do this in a podcast or in real life. This is what's unique about FDR.
-
Women like confidence.
You said you wanted to send a letter because you lack confidence.
For the love of god and all that is holy, don't send her a letter unless you wanna eliminate any chance you might have with this woman.
-
2
-
-
Win.
-
2
-
-
So, what does that mean for the rest of us? The best couples I met, the women during their youth dedicated to the man they married, and now, they are having kids. For me, they are the template of the ideal relationship, and their woman is the archetype. I know it is not precisely it but, these little tidbits of success, of staying power, loyalty, and commitment are not something I see in the dating world. Yeah, I have known youth is the key. The hard part is that, I am older then you, and what I would give to be 27 again. Granted, I am not much older. A year, I would love to take forward the insight of dating I have now, and give to myself.
A woman that likes me complained about marriage. She does not want kids so, this eliminates her from being a prospective partner. I tried online. I have tried pua. I have tried sites. I have had luck but, in very miniscule manners and really, define "luck?" I had dated some really incredible women but, it was usually on a road trip or working abroad. It is usually some situation of serendipity and fortuity. There is some aspect of chance but, at this point, I am feeling more and more like MGTOW is calling. This puts the fear of God in me. It is not that I don't appreciate what insight I took from it. It is that I want a family and despite the foolishness of marriage given the laws now a days, my blasted male mind craves it.
The problem, outside online dating, a few new girls I approached, I have no actual prospective partners I could see myself exclusive with at this point. I wish it were much simpler but, there is far too many proud single moms irl or online. IMHO, someone more my age is and has been through carousel 2.0 and if not for biology, I feel like there would be zero interest in settling down. I am sort of at a crossroad. I am thinking of backpacking through Napoli Coast. I want to see the world before my time is up on this planet. I want to share these experiences with someone but, I am constantly bombarded with reference experiences that leave me feeling like I am already MGTOW.
A woman that wants to settle down won't go for someone that's on the move. There's always the risk of the prospect suddenly leaving, and women do not like risk.
About the woman that you said doesn't want to get married. She can change her mind. It's not set in stone that she has to get married and immediately start having kids. I have never met a woman that said they didn't want to get married and have kids. It's always "I don't want to get married and have kids at this moment in time". Another alternative could be she's waiting to see if a better mark will come along. Did you ask her if that's the case?
-
Have you seen the movie "Hail, Caesar!" ?
The Coen brothers are probably one of my favorite directors of all time and I strongly recommend every movie they ever made. In this movie they offer a glimpse into the inside workings of Hollywood (or at the very least how things used to be). Long story short, movie stars are movie stars. That's their job. Acting is part of their job but being an actor is not their job, if that makes any sense. They are always under a contract and that contract stipulates among other things how much media attention they will get and how they should promote the movie AND behave. Point I'm trying to make is that the persona of the actor we see on screen is just another character. Whether it's a moral or immoral character should matter as much as how moral or immoral the guy holding the camera is in their personal life.
People love drama and drama sells more tickets. Check out MMA. Who fights who is not exactly decided on a hierarchical level, it's decided based on hype. Skill is necessary but not sufficient.
Harrison Ford was never a nice guy. When George Lucas first met him he said he was the most unlikeable person he's ever seen (Ford was there to paint his house btw). That didn't change. Hollywood just spun a tale about how he's not who he really is in order to sell more tickets.
I myself was very heartbroken when I found out Chris Evans was an absolute cuck but I'm not paying to see Chris Evans. I'm paying to see Captain America. That said I have no idea how I would act if he were to have sex with a drugged out 19 year old. However keep in mind that acts like these back then were to be expected and rarely frowned upon. It's the whole should we judge the past by the standards of today conundrum.
-
TFW when you realize many anarcho-capitalists have no self knowledge and are just r-selected social justice warriors who want to do drugs and have casual sex.
-
1
-
-
Stefan Molyneux MKUltra George Soros shill confirmed !
-
3
-
-
Japan has the herbivore men. I don't quite get it or understand but, it sounds pretty much like MGTOW. I know what you mean. It is a symptom of a much larger problem. Men that realize they failed in a marriage economically or others that have failed in the dating world checked out for their own self interest. The difference is that, in doing so, you are not doing like Deida suggests, living at your edge, and giving of your gifts whatever they maybe.
I met this girl in a coffee shop. She told me she was a student and we got talking about our life plans. She brought up some event and I said, "that sounded like an invite." I took her number but, that was the highlight of everything. It reminded me of the coffee shop scene of the Pitt movie. This was the highlight. We ended up going out but, we had absolutely nothing in common and she was very argumentative. White girl on a date venting about "white privilege." What she meant was "white male privilege." We never hung out again and I didn't even text her but, she still took the drink. It is that sort of shit that pisses me off so, I have learned not to bother in the future.
By that, I don't mean give up on dating. I mean, the millennials are about "Netflix and chill." It is $8.99 or $10.99 for HD. I have tried dating older. I notice a lot of baggage. I tried dating younger. Lots of divas. I date middle or late twenties and you would think you were talking to someone in high school. Lots of partying and clubbing. I don't get it.
I know what you mean about dating.
Judging by the couples I know there's a sweetspot for success. The successful couples usually begin dating in their early twenties and go to the same university (meaning they'll have the same career path). Sometimes they begin dating from highschool but if they choose different career paths it will most likely result in a dismissal of the relationship. Quality people with whom you can start a family with disappear after the mid twenties because they'll most likely get scooped up by someone else because the demand is so high. I'm 27 and the women of worth that have caught my attention within the same age bracket or older all were very, very married. So younger is the way to go if you want to get a shot.
-
MGTOW is not a solution, it is a symptom.
We need to have less empathy for and pay less attention to whores. The more we subsidize something the more of that something we're gonna get.
-
1
-
-
Yes. That's the idea of the message board. You just reviewed the text on this thread because you desired to find something engaging. What you read was engaging enough that you joined the discussion.
If the discussion happened in real time it would have been over and obsolete by the time you were able to log on.
After some time has passed if you return and review the discussion you will continue to expand on your ideas simply from having something to contrast your immediate beliefs about the subject of discussion.
In fact, your own opinions can serve to contrast your present state of perception about any given subject. That is one of the great tools acquired with the practice of keeping a journal.
But this was a conversation about ideas. None of us are emotionally invested in it and none of us have ongoing relationships depending on it.
-
Stefan posts links on Facebook that are discussions about fundamental matters encapsulated in time. The ability to review and reflect on discussions is an essential aspect of the effectiveness of FDR as a knowledge resource.
You actually think people would spend the time to go over someone else's walls of text because they're so engaging and the arguments put fort are so enlightening?
When 2 strangers talk through text it's either to reinforce their preconvictions or to virtue signal.
You can no more communicate with someone effectively over text than you can listen to music by looking at sheet music. I'm not saying it can't be done, but humans haven't evolved to talk through text.
-
What AI problem? Could you elaborate?
As in how we can create AI and how human-level AI can be achieved.
-
Book recommendation: Jeff Hawkins - On Intelligence
It explains how the brain works, the difference between conscience and intelligence and why we'll NEVER create human level AI because creating human level AI literally requires creating a human. The movie Ex-Machina also got it right. The guy didn't create AI, he created an artificial person with the same needs and limitations of a normal human.
We cracked the AI problem decades ago and we've been using AI in our day to day lives ever since (firewalls, auto-correct, video-games, etc).
Dominance over a group is a distinctively human trait therefore to say that a computer would develop human characteristics is just LOTR style fantasy.
-
This is a rehash of a decade long video:
-
If South Park has ever taught me anything is that I should beware the cum and joke mines of Mars.
-
Stefan has explained on many occasions FDR is not for everyone and is not a sure way to happiness. Philosophy is not a vaccine or the like, it's chemotherapy. There's a good chance it's gonna kill off the cancer but there' also an equally good chance it's gonna kill you off sooner.
-
They ARE going to overthrow this election. The MSM predicted a 98% chance of this happening.
-
Lol I'd love to see evidence of this. I see ads constantly for special "period panties."
-
Everything that raises your sexual market value should make you feel good because just like sex the end result is a higher chance of spreading your genes.
-
Stefan, Would you please wade into the arena of Vaccine safety. Over the last year or so I've done quite of bit of study on this issue. Watching crap tons of lectures on YouTube from very credible sources like, Dr. Suzanne Humphries, Sherri Tenpenny, Andrew Wakefield and others. These are classically trained doctors who came to their own conclusions about vaccines at great cost to their livelihoods. I've also read Dr. Suzanne Humphries book "Dissolving the Illusions". What a book!! So if I were to lay down a theory I would phrase it something like this.
Vaccines are Unsafe!! We are being used as guinea pigs by the US and World governments through forced Vaccinations. The rise of Autism, Peanut Allergies, and other strange childhood infliction are most certainly caused by Vaccines.
Now although I've come to this conclusion I have an open mind to be corrected on this issue. Believe me I want to be wrong! I have children and grandchildren that have all been vaccinated. Right now I feel like I let them down by not being educated enough to make a wise decision on the matter. For instance when the school district and my X wife put my youngest on Adderal for ADHD I threw a fit. But a fit is not enough. So I bought and read Dr. Peter Breggin's book "Talking back to Ritalin" I went back to the school loaded with more facts and information than they had and won the argument. My youngest was taken off Adderal immediately. She did fine by the way. She just needed to different forms of instruction from the teachers.
Thanks Stefan for all the research you do and the way you go out of the way to bring this information to the masses. I really enjoy the Bullet Point approach to your lectures where you are in the upper left hand corner of the screen while each bullet point you make comes onto the screen as you're talking. Thanks again for your work.
Recently I have looked into US mandatory vaccination and my own country's (Romania) mandatory vaccination.
There's basically no real difference.
In Romania however the instances of autism/ADHD or whatever allergies have not increased.
Peanut butter in the US is a common food which all kids are exposed to perhaps consumed even daily.
In Romania nobody has a taste for it and we occasionally consume peanuts.
In Romania basically psychology is not formally recognized meaning psychologists cannot diagnose anyone or prescribe medication. If a child gets diagnosed with ADHD by a psychologist they need to go to a psychiatrist in order to get tested, rediagnosed and get the desired medicine. Psychiatrists usually deal with severe cases, patients that are institutionalized for life because their mental illness is a danger to themselves or others. When a kid walks in with some behavior problems like ADHD they'll just shrug it off much like an epidemiologist shrugs off seasonal flu. I have a friend who works with autistic children, he told me a lot of people that call themselves autistic from YouTube vids are not. Furthermore there is not a "high functioning autistic child" type of concept in our culture. We just call those people "weird".
So in conclusion peanut allergies and the like might be a result of exposure to the allergen and the high incidence of mental disorder might be due to impulsive diagnosis.
I'm curious, do you know what the vaccines your child takes inoculate against?
-
2
-
1
-
-
Excuse me? Can you please provide evidence for this extraordinary claim? I couldn’t find any story on an assassination.
No proof of life since the last leak.
-
-
1
-
-
Have you guys been following up on 4chan's investigation into the government for pedophilia?
This guy does a pretty decent job on chronicling the data so far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gi6ryNOg8z0
The evidence is absolutely insane. Over the past year there have been several credible sources on 4chan and other anonymous image boards that have given sensitive information to bring down the Clintons. From warnings about the Trump-tape (even before its release) to advice to suggestions to investigate the Clinton-Foundation over anything else. However there have been several warning regarding this particular rabbit-hole implying it goes really deep implicating powerful foreign state officials.
Assange is more than likely dead and with his assassination one has to wonder if we're not on the brink of a world-wide crisis if those in power are getting so desperate to resort to such drastic means.
-
5
-
1
-
-
As Constantinople burned intellectuals were arguing over he gender of angels.
What you are witnessing is a well know socialist tactic. It's detailed in Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals": always hold your opponent accountable to their own principles.
Anarchists/libertarians have the moral argument on their side, there should be no stopping them... unless you make them too scared to act lest they violate the NAP.
Never ever forget:
THE NAP DOES NOT APPLY TO COMMUNISTS/SOCIALISTS.
-
5
-
1
-
Spanking As A Method For Teaching Responsibility
in Peaceful Parenting
Posted
I don't understand the point of this post.
a) you just repeated what Stefan said in his recent video
b) nobody here is pro-spanking