Wuzzums
-
Posts
1,239 -
Joined
-
Days Won
38
Posts posted by Wuzzums
-
-
I have facts.
Trump is doing all the things he said he would do during the campaign and his 100 days plan.
Iran was never mentioned therefore Iran will not be attacked.
-
1
-
-
My previous post addresses your "evidence"
Negate it is.
-
I really dont see your evidence anywhere. I might have missed it, so please point it out to me if I have.
heres what you said
This is not evidence that legalising gay marriage will lead to a slippery slope. This is you stating that conservatives have CLAIMED that it will lead to a slippery slope.
Even saying "look whats happening now, therefore, slippery slope" is not evidence. It MAY be the case, sure, but you havent shown it. you havent shown causation. You havent shown that one necessarily follows from the other. You have , at best, shown correlation.
You also havent shown that the slippery slope argument is sufficient evidence to support not allowing gay marriage.
I agree
There's the post. There's the evidence (some of it). Concede or negate.
-
Nope, your "addressing it" was simply restating the slippery slope fallacy
pointing out that it is the slippery slope fallacy is an argument. Its pointing out a flaw in your logic.
You said it's not an argument that gay marriage leads to a slippery slope leading to the promotion of pedophilia.
You showed no evidence.
I showed clear evidence to the contrary.
You can either concede or pretend the evidence doesn't exist.
Your move.
-
Not an argument.
I have clearly addressed this in a reply.
-
I want to learn preferably without getting ass blasted by Stefan
Since I am well aware that main stream media is dishonest what lesson about how to think am I going to gain from an hour long video about why Jeff Sessions is obviously not a racist?
That video was not just for you exclusively. Surely you see how we (or at the very least I) see your post as nothing more than concern trolling when you don't even donate. Take it as a life certainty that you will always be met with staunch opposition when you make demands but offer nothing in return.
I think you think going after Jeff Sessions for being pro drug war is irrelevant or unimportant because you've already covered drug war in the past. Does that sound about right?
Time and time again it was explained that this is a fight for gaining control of the narrative, or pushing back against the false narrative or however you wanna describe it. The drug war is important, yes. That is a fight for another day. Now we are fighting the MSM. If we don't win this fight we'll never get to fight against the drug war. Capisci?
"You head off trouble down the road once you've dealt with the trouble on it."
-
2
-
-
Found this clip that does seem to be compelling to me:
https://www.facebook.com/1770946429820305/videos/1820992804815667/
-
Audio books.
Reading, as in the actual action of looking at text, is a very archaic form of communication and counter-productive to our nature. Learning how to read is as an arduous process as is learning how to draw, or play an instrument, diet, and so on. Silent reading is a phenomenon only centuries old if I'm not mistaken. People used to have to read out loud in order for them to comprehend what words were written. The spacing between words is also artificial because there is no such thing in human speech. If you look at the audiogram of someone talking it's basically impossible to distinguish by looking where one word begins and ends.
We didn't evolve to hear sounds with our eyes. Given the same text, the brain has to work a lot more to understand it by reading it than by listening to it. Audiobooks are far more efficient, you don't have to sit down and focus all your brain power on them, you don't have to make periodic pauses, you don't have to liner on phrases you didn't understand because you read them wrong, etc.
I got into audiobooks about 10 years ago, and it wasn't an easy process, but now I can't consume books any other way. In fact I have had a period when I would "read" 2 books per week. I don't anymore because I kinda ran out. I don't worry myself with how much of the book I remember after reading it because not all books are worth remembering. I trust my brain to sort out from the barrage of information I give it what is interesting and useful to me and not to waste precious brainspace with pointless data.
I know some people sell reading as a mark of intelligence. It's no more a mark of intelligence as is watching movies/documentaries.
-
2
-
-
There is a huge difference between a lawyer just going along with the law and Jeff Sessions stating for the record that no good people smoke marijuana. That is an insight into the way he thinks and it's very ugly.
It's ugly because he's lying or it's ugly because he actually believes a falsehood?
-
1
-
-
I knew someone was going to try to frame me as a leftist.
I didn't say you are a leftist nor did I say I was pro war on drugs.
Morality is not a one way path that leads to pedophilia.
Mhm. I'm not debating ethics with you, I'm arguing over real life consequences:
This is about freedom and liberty.
I don't know what that phrase means because you just used two interchangeable terms as being different. This sort of confusion you have over your principles is an excellent way for the enemy to exploit your views for their own agenda.
So again, you don't want Jeff Sessions because you disagree with his VIEWS on the war on drugs. Fair enough.
Do you have any friends or acquaintances that do not share your views on drugs?
Do you think FDR should disassociate with anyone that doesn't share your views on the war on drugs?
Do you also think lawyers should follow their own personal views instead of the law?
I believe 98% of the anti cop attitude coming from this country is caused by the drug war.
Make your case then. Don't just moan at people to behave the way you want them to for the sake of your "beliefs".
I'm waiting.
-
I agree with the debt explanation.
Either they let a bunch of people in and they assimilate and relieve the debt.
Or they let a bunch of people in and they don't assimilate which will lead to conflict, then war, which in turn will relieve the debt.
The leaders are collectivists mostly and like the scum they are their end goal is communism.
Individuality, culture, religion, the family, commerce, education, these are all bulwarks against the cancer. They need to be destroyed in order to enforce communism successfully. It's always the people/communities/countries that hold those values sacred that are attacked and blamed for everything that goes wrong. The US media started blaming Russia (ex-communist country) for seemingly everything and now the EU started doing the same. Hollywood is slowly turning itself over to the communist chinese and not a peep from anyone. Remember when North Korea was at the forefront of the media sold as some massive threat that will inevitable lead to a major war? What happened there is what I wanna know.
What happened with Greece was a major wake-up call for the europeans that maybe the EU is not such a great idea. So this whole migrant crisis might just be a slight of hand, pay attention to this bit and ignore us leaders in Brussels while we take away your sovereignty and make you wholly dependent to the state.
-
It sucks being looked down on by someone you respect. It sucks more when you are alienated by everyone around you. I don't expect you to tell me drugs are ok. I know they are bad and I'm not looking to justify my own bad behavior. But I do expect you to have the courage and wisdom to say "its not okay for people to imprison you and destroy your life because you do drugs" despite what the finger wagging baby boomer Jeff Sessions type people have to say.
huh?
You seem the kind of guy that only looks 1 foot ahead of him. This is about the big picture. This is the battle the left has been playing for decades and people like you (and once upon a time me also) don't see it.
Take gay marriage for instance.
Conservatives have always argued it will lead to a slippery slope therefore marriage should always be between a man and woman.
Liberals have argued the moral stance saying it's a human right and the government should have no say in that matter.
And where are we now? Yep, the left is strongly pushing for pedophilia and child rape to be not only accepted but also virtuous in doing so.
This is what you're doing. You're arguing the moral stance which will lead to the barring of a worthwhile candidate in the fight against collectivism.
-
3
-
3
-
-
The opposition wants you and you and your kin to be poor and weak and pathetic. Make no mistake, we are in a war and in a war the most important thing is winning.
-
1
-
-
You simply could have asked for more not passive aggressive banter and attacks. With that said, the conversation is over.
You can't say "conversation over" by replying. You clearly continued it.
-
1
-
-
Maybe it is reading comprehension. The response was the counter balance to male nature. What part of that don't you understand? How else would you like to encapsulate? How about you respond to the question or you can be passive aggressive like a woman.
You want me to respond and not be passive aggressive (like a woman) while not responding to my question by being passive aggressive (like a woman).
Have you met my friend irony? You should.
"Counter balance to male nature" is a non-answer because you neither defined male nature nor explained what a counter balance to male nature would be.
-
1
-
-
Can somebody re-post the link? I'm getting "URL Address Expired."
https://i.imgur.com/8wsVrzw.png
That is not an argument. Either you disliked that or you wished for something else.
A person interested in a conversation would actively engage in the topic and not be dismissive about questions on clarification of their point.
I asked a simple question, you gave a dismissive answer.
Therefore you're venting.
So YES. YES, it WAS AN ARGUMENT.
-
2
-
-
The counter balance to male nature.
You don't wanna talk. You just want to vent out your sexual frustration. Fine.
-
1
-
-
It seems to be the solution Stefan provides; wait for the state and free money barrage to fail. This is not a solution. You see female nature and what is the alternative but to take your ball and go home like MGTOW or to continue to approach and swipe right at girls online or to online date. Still, it is a pool of serial monogamy, of booty call, sluts, whoring around for free resources or jewels, chasing bad boys or social status, men of money, and when it fails, there is the crutch of the state or betas and cucks to fix the issue.
I am reading Stefan's book which is shedding the light on things to watchout for such as manipulation and it sheds the light on some of my own contradictions and behavior that can be deemed as unfair. For instance, introducing to friends and family i rarely due until it has proven she is genuine, loyal, honest, ahd on a quest for self awareness/self knowledge.
So what's female nature to you?
-
We see female nature for what it is, not how we wish it were to be. There is no going back at this point.
Blame Hollywood and video games for tricking you on what the female nature is. MGTOW's fell for the same sort of propaganda that feminists did and do.
You might not "go back" at this point but men have been accepting this reality and willingly choosing it for literally hundreds of thousands of years. I was expecting a market crash or something far into the near future for this sort of thinking to take hold but apparently fear is quite the powerful incentive.
-
Did Trump just fix gender relations? What's going on? I can't even keep up with all this winning.
-
8
-
-
The turnout is HUGE. Literally HUGE !!
-
What leads you to think it wouldn't result in more superior art being made?
A product that nobody wants will not get made and if it does get made then nobody will know of it which is tantamount to non-existence.
-
The final objective standard for art is time. There have been Beyonce-level famous artists during Freddie Mercury's lifetime, Mozart's lifetime, DaVinci's lifetime, and so on.
Why is this important to you, though?
What would a highly accurate objective standard for art achieve?
Will it result in more superior art being made? No.
Will it result in less crappy art being made? No.
Unless of course your aim is to make people enjoy certain things and not enjoy others at gunpoint. Then I would imagine you could make quite the profit under the guise of "providing a service".
As a side note Trump in his book said how much he loved modern art. He said it's an homage to salesmanship because you really have to be phenomenally good at it in order to sell that crap.
-
I like poker as a comparison to trading. They are alike in a lot of ways. I think its kinda foolish to say trading is all luck though... Investing is the industry that has created the most billionaires in the world. They couldn't have all gotten there by luck. I doubt even one of them got where they are because of luck.
I always find it funny when people think it's impossible to do things that someone else is already doing.
Stock trading or forex are not investing. Both are based on a zero-sum game so they don't create anything, just move money around.
---
in Current Events
Posted
I have a friend that told me one of his coworkers said that the trouble with Trump is that after him, elected officials will actually have to keep by their promises. It's no surprise to me that Reason, which backed Gary Johnson (LOL !) is still way behind the rest of us.
The God Emperor changed the rules of the game forever. Every other politician will forever be compared to him by his fans or critics. The whole world is watching and learning and realizing what can be achieved.