Jump to content

TheBen

Member
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Taxachusetss
  • Interests
    Bitcoin, poker, philosphy

TheBen's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

30

Reputation

  1. So transgender parents can choose which bathroom to bring their children into but non-transgendered mothers and fathers must stick to their biologically assigned bathrooms? I don't want to straw man you here but this seems to be what you are saying. Please let me know if I am mistaken. I really think this issue is way too complex for the government to get involved in. Wouldn't it be best to just leave the decision of making these rules up to the establishment rather than use violence to enforce state given doctrine?
  2. A question to all here. Should fathers be allowed to accompany their daughters into women's bathroom's in order to protect them from sexual deviants? Should the law allow for this type of thing to happen?
  3. Thank you and I completely agree with you here. I also believe all people should be allowed to pursue happiness in any way they see fit as long as they don't infringe on the rights of others. I wish the "trans" community the best, I just don't think they should be forcing their views on other people, most notably children. I have no intentions of hurting anyone of this orientation, though I personally don't want to be around them, so they would not be permitted to enter my home. I do think that the PC culture has taken this issue way too far and children are being victimized in the process. I hope these types of issues get more attention among all persuasions of people and the consensus becomes what you have written above. --Ben --Ben
  4. You continue to lend credence to my hypothesis. Are you going to answer my honest and straightforward question? Do you agree than children should not be "transified" or are you of the opinion that it is okay to inject children with hormones in order to attempt to change their biologically assigned traits?
  5. This is why I said, "I believe I communicated my point quite clearly..." I do think he was picking a nit in order to obscure what I was saying by focusing on something completely irrelevant. Both previous respondents to what I was saying haven't yet agreed that children should not be injected with hormones to change their biologically inherited traits. This confirms my hypothesis that they think this form of child abuse is okay. This is despicable in my opinion and must be called out more, even if the PC police are going to throw ad hominem attacks.
  6. I will not bow to the Cultural Marxists' shaping of the English language plus I didn't even use the word this person said I used. Am I not allowed to ask questions? Don't straw man me please. You can re-read the conversation and have more understanding of it if you like, or not. --Ben
  7. I believe I communicated my point quite clearly and you are not the arbiter of language. Do you agree than children should not be "transified" or are you of the opinion that it is okay to inject children with hormones in order to attempt to change their biologically assigned traits? --Ben
  8. As long as the "trans" community doesn't condemn people that take part in the "transification" of children, I will consider them a predator parasitical segment of society. I have seen far too many stories in the news of this happening and I have yet to hear of one "trans" person openly objecting and showing their disgust of this, as they should. This type of child abuse cannot be tolerated IMO. I won't respond to your ad-hominems and other vapid ideas though I will add, "You say I am a bigot, fine then, I am a bigot. I am large. I contain multitudes." --Ben
  9. "Transgendered" people are people that are self identifying as being fucked up psychologically and in a sexual sense. People that open carry are simply exercising their right and duty to self protection. Also people were not afraid of "trans" people using the bathroom pre-transgendered focused laws. It is societies catering to this particular brand of disordered people that is most startling. --Ben
  10. The term racism has no value because one must follow up with the question, "What do you mean by that?"
  11. You are right and your God is "science" and it's Pope is NASA.
  12. I think you mean, "Would China have faked the Moon Landings without the west?" And I think you can find the answer if you look into the Chinese culture. Did they have a history of faking things like this such as the Great Moon Hoax of 1835? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Moon_Hoax I don't know as I haven't looked into Chinese history much but I'm sure the answers are out there... --Ben
  13. The easiest and most effective way to change the world is to change yourself. You think that the issue here is your brother and his family but the problem is you. It is your duty as someone who is striving to be a moral person to pick your battles wisely and spread virtue where it can grow. In my opinion you are not helping your brother and his family at all and you may even be hurting them. You are trying to use logic and reason with people that refuse to take even the smallest steps at bettering the lives of themselves and their family. I'm sure you have heard of Dunning and Kroeger. When you bring logic and evidence to people to try to sway their opinion, they can tend to double down and believe in their shit values even more. I would urge you to please stop torturing yourself by attempting to help those who have shown very little sign of positive growth. Move on and get over this situation. Go find good people and be around them. Shape your life so that you are enriched by the daily activities that you choose to do. Maybe living a positive life will show your brother's children that it is indeed possible to overcome and achieve happiness. If you continue to "value" your relationship with your brother and his family, then you may be validating their dysfunction in the eyes of his children. I think that this is the best and perhaps the only way you can help this horrid situation. --Ben
  14. Also there is only 1 potentially real picture of Earth from space and it's from 1972. All the others are composites or fake CGI.
  15. That's the cointelpro disinfo site. The real flat earthers are at: http://ifers.boards.net/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.