ZeroZeroZero

I'm not suggesting they aren't cesspools; cesspool isnt even a good enough word to describe these places. What I'm asking is wouldn't they become worse if the state was eliminated? A great solution but wouldn't it be more economically feasible to just abandon cities all together? A few acres of land can often be cheaper than an NYC apartment, not to mention cleaner air and less light pollution.

Massive population centers such as LA and NYC are kept afloat by central planning, but in the absence of the state will they decay and collapse? If large cities are incapable of sustaining themselves without central planning shouldn't anti-statist promote ideas such as de-urbanization and neo tribalism?