Psychophant

You do not have to go that far. It is not exactly widespread knowledge that the clitoris and vulva are equally as vulnerable, if not more than texticles, to force such as punching or kicking.

The Problem is, she would not even ask to slap him but probably do it if he was hurting her delicate feelings. The actual problem is the double standard and the normalization of violence concerning men.

I do not fear rejection. Modern "empowered" chicks usually come over to me and say something along the lines of "Wanna go for a drink handsome" but I am not that sharlow when it comes to dating, you know. Anyone knows that the odds are high that those chicks are gold diggers, since a half way decent looking girl in general likes her cake and eat it, too. She is weak when it comes to responsibility and strong on the dating market, since simp's pussy addiction inflates females' market value. Lolicons are NAWALTS by default.

She should check her prejudice first, then her assertion for an argument. The whole privilege accusation has a lot incomen with the infinite regression problem if someone starts pointing out that your problem is insignificant compared to some poor negro kiddies in Sudan.

Hard to say, because the vibes are important. If I sense that the person gives me a good gut feeling and is at least interesting, I can endure its presence for a long time. I disassemble what has been said rationally while being all touchy feely. Feelings aren't less important than reason but you cannot feel da truth, yo.

You cannot take someone's time since everybody owns his own schedule. Unless you would take him hostage or were a prison guard who rules over other peoples' time, there is no way to do it. No, you don't. Otherwise leaking some information about your life without consent would be theft by default. Information is not scarce by any means. One major property of property is scarcity. Unless someone restrained you and violently measured your brain activity in order to extract information about your personal life, I don't say any violation of the in-high-esteem held NAP. If someone values honesty in personal interactions, it is hypocritical to tell people blatant lies.

Darn, in the days of the good old patriarchy women's actions depended on your approval and nowaday if you don't approve of their actions they bully or shame you by proxy in order to make them look good. Ah, actually those overt gynocentric women, also called feminists who pretend to speak on behalf of all women do that.

Oh, I would attend such a rape prevention course under the premise there was an anti robbery course for blacks only - I had pointed that out. I like sexism it improves the blood circulation to the extend of bad shit crazy, so that the moral blood vessels expand. That is one good reason for home schooling or unschooling, not let the little buggers visit propaganda facillities. Do ya think the Germans got rid of uncle Schindelhuber. Not at all, his enforced school attendence prevails up to these days and if ya wanna homeschool or unschool get used to French baguettes if ya live in Europe.

The word radical feminists is a misnomer. That is like saying radical atheists. Feminism is an ideology and those who life their values are pretty hostile. Others don´t count, cause what is a racist who is not envolved into anything racist, lifes in the hood and attends a concert of Jay-Z? Not much of a racist, right?

Yeah, there are also circumstances known where the initiation of violence is voluntary instead of being a form of force. In general terms it is the initiation of force. Teasing is particularly painfull if someone doubles the abuse by downplaying it.

Since the agreement is unspoken, it is abuse from the begining. In general terms. Otherwise it would be like saying that theft is not theft if the person stops when being told to do so. In theory there is the possibility that the shop owner agrees with someone´s shop lifting but you cannot take it for granted, just because he does not say a thing. Abuse is not bullying, because bullying is defined by: Bullying is a means to abuse but a lack of force threat or coercion is simply abuse.

Do ya ever heard about anarcho syndicalists? Those dudes are actually communists. You can refuse capitalism and still be an anarchists in the same way as you can be an atheist without being a mass murderer. Why would you even worry about his integrity if the morality of someone wasn´t an issue in the pursuit of truth? Yeah, you could examine everything by yourself but it is still a little bit too much to process for a single person, therefore you need experts in the field. Therefore you need to know where this person is coming from to determine wether or not it has something important to tell.

If you accept these term you also have to refer to neurotypical social skills instead of social skills, cuz otherwise it would be inconsistent to make a normative statement about a particular skill set. From the extreme introvert sugar coated with Asperger´s Syndrom.

Wow, I wonder whether delving into the 'freak show' stories says more about your IQ than about the one of those you judge. Wherin exactly is the difference between 99, 100 or 101 IQ points? It is a rethorical question. The answer is provided here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_classification#Variance_in_individual_IQ_classification Why bro? They are looking for the perfect servant who doesn´t ask for reciprocity.

Downvotes are meaningless in the current setting, since there is no objective standard. Nothing is wrong, it is just projection on your part, I guess. I´d suggest to get off your stick and spare your conjecture based on implicit questions or I´ll ask you if somebody told you too many rape jokes and drowned your kitty in the bathtub in order to make you to come up with such nonesense. I wonder what this female herd mentality will lead to or whether it is the basis for the special snowflake movement - those who say that you cannot understand them because of privelege etc. Maybe I sound like an early feminist who bitched about mens´ clubs but AFAIK men´s clubs weren´t based on genitalia and/or special snowflakery but almost exclusively on general interests. To not criticise someone for the wrong reasons.