Psychophant

You do not have to go that far. It is not exactly widespread knowledge that the clitoris and vulva are equally as vulnerable, if not more than texticles, to force such as punching or kicking.

The Problem is, she would not even ask to slap him but probably do it if he was hurting her delicate feelings. The actual problem is the double standard and the normalization of violence concerning men.

I do not fear rejection. Modern "empowered" chicks usually come over to me and say something along the lines of "Wanna go for a drink handsome" but I am not that sharlow when it comes to dating, you know. Anyone knows that the odds are high that those chicks are gold diggers, since a half way decent looking girl in general likes her cake and eat it, too. She is weak when it comes to responsibility and strong on the dating market, since simp's pussy addiction inflates females' market value. Lolicons are NAWALTS by default.

She should check her prejudice first, then her assertion for an argument. The whole privilege accusation has a lot incomen with the infinite regression problem if someone starts pointing out that your problem is insignificant compared to some poor negro kiddies in Sudan.

Hard to say, because the vibes are important. If I sense that the person gives me a good gut feeling and is at least interesting, I can endure its presence for a long time. I disassemble what has been said rationally while being all touchy feely. Feelings aren't less important than reason but you cannot feel da truth, yo.

You cannot take someone's time since everybody owns his own schedule. Unless you would take him hostage or were a prison guard who rules over other peoples' time, there is no way to do it. No, you don't. Otherwise leaking some information about your life without consent would be theft by default. Information is not scarce by any means. One major property of property is scarcity. Unless someone restrained you and violently measured your brain activity in order to extract information about your personal life, I don't say any violation of the in-high-esteem held NAP. If someone values honesty in personal interactions, it is hypocritical to tell people blatant lies.

Darn, in the days of the good old patriarchy women's actions depended on your approval and nowaday if you don't approve of their actions they bully or shame you by proxy in order to make them look good. Ah, actually those overt gynocentric women, also called feminists who pretend to speak on behalf of all women do that.

Oh, I would attend such a rape prevention course under the premise there was an anti robbery course for blacks only - I had pointed that out. I like sexism it improves the blood circulation to the extend of bad shit crazy, so that the moral blood vessels expand. That is one good reason for home schooling or unschooling, not let the little buggers visit propaganda facillities. Do ya think the Germans got rid of uncle Schindelhuber. Not at all, his enforced school attendence prevails up to these days and if ya wanna homeschool or unschool get used to French baguettes if ya live in Europe.

The word radical feminists is a misnomer. That is like saying radical atheists. Feminism is an ideology and those who life their values are pretty hostile. Others don´t count, cause what is a racist who is not envolved into anything racist, lifes in the hood and attends a concert of Jay-Z? Not much of a racist, right?

Yeah, there are also circumstances known where the initiation of violence is voluntary instead of being a form of force. In general terms it is the initiation of force. Teasing is particularly painfull if someone doubles the abuse by downplaying it.

Since the agreement is unspoken, it is abuse from the begining. In general terms. Otherwise it would be like saying that theft is not theft if the person stops when being told to do so. In theory there is the possibility that the shop owner agrees with someone´s shop lifting but you cannot take it for granted, just because he does not say a thing. Abuse is not bullying, because bullying is defined by: Bullying is a means to abuse but a lack of force threat or coercion is simply abuse.

Do ya ever heard about anarcho syndicalists? Those dudes are actually communists. You can refuse capitalism and still be an anarchists in the same way as you can be an atheist without being a mass murderer. Why would you even worry about his integrity if the morality of someone wasn´t an issue in the pursuit of truth? Yeah, you could examine everything by yourself but it is still a little bit too much to process for a single person, therefore you need experts in the field. Therefore you need to know where this person is coming from to determine wether or not it has something important to tell.

If you accept these term you also have to refer to neurotypical social skills instead of social skills, cuz otherwise it would be inconsistent to make a normative statement about a particular skill set. From the extreme introvert sugar coated with Asperger´s Syndrom.

Wow, I wonder whether delving into the 'freak show' stories says more about your IQ than about the one of those you judge. Wherin exactly is the difference between 99, 100 or 101 IQ points? It is a rethorical question. The answer is provided here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_classification#Variance_in_individual_IQ_classification Why bro? They are looking for the perfect servant who doesn´t ask for reciprocity.

Downvotes are meaningless in the current setting, since there is no objective standard. Nothing is wrong, it is just projection on your part, I guess. I´d suggest to get off your stick and spare your conjecture based on implicit questions or I´ll ask you if somebody told you too many rape jokes and drowned your kitty in the bathtub in order to make you to come up with such nonesense. I wonder what this female herd mentality will lead to or whether it is the basis for the special snowflake movement - those who say that you cannot understand them because of privelege etc. Maybe I sound like an early feminist who bitched about mens´ clubs but AFAIK men´s clubs weren´t based on genitalia and/or special snowflakery but almost exclusively on general interests. To not criticise someone for the wrong reasons.

Nope, I like to wear skirts and tights and like the colour pink but I identify as a freestyler. There are more extreme forms of freestylers out there who could be confused with a tranny. Who is the women folk to judge if they wear trousers suits, bow-ties and sneakers nowadays? Even if you put the objective nature of gendered clothing aside, they cannot criticise men for being freestylers themself without being hypocrites. I also take an active stand against sexism against men by doing so. By not catering to the majority of women´s preference in men I also fight gynocentrism.

Oh, it probably is a conspirative gathering of women who want to start conquering the shoe industry to produce shoes more cheaply in order to achive that every woman can afford 20 pair of shoes. It could be also the case that it is just a gathering of women who want to become strong and independend. It is easy gals, a woman who can lift me (95kg) up is a strong woman - no one could denial it and a independend woman is a woman who does anything but mooching off husbands, lovers or parents.

A consensual threesome with a 16 year old lad and two hot blond teachers envolved makes a lucky dude. No prob so far, unless he was mentally retarded and couldn´t consent. What does fully developed even entail? Obviously more than being able to consent to sex and being able to assess the consequences of aformentioned act. If a 16 years old is able to do that with a gal the same age, he is able to do it with everybody.

Yeah bro and the funny thing is goverments prop up an overproduction of meat, milk and egg by subisdizing its overhead disposal in the EUDSSR. Ponds of milk butter etc. The demand for inexpensive meat is there: According to the law of diminishing marginal benefit, these numbers should be stable then. It is easy, even if something was dirt cheap, the benefit per unit would decline with every piece until you would start to puke. Fatty 1st piece: Cheesecake, yummy. Fatty 2nd piece: Cheesecake, yummy. Fatty 3rd piece: Cheesecake! I am starting to be fed up. Fatty 4th piece: It is cheap is hell but I am starting to feel bad. Fatty 5th piece: *puke* Although the demand is inflated, it indicates what is possible under the current price level. Given that it is ineffective due to subsidies for production and disposal the incentive for more effectivity could keept the prices down or the hidden costs.

That´s great, "forever alone" is better than being forever lonely. Let alone only benefitting a woman by marrying her. I know it is hip to be Stef but is way hipper to be yourself. Maybe you are an extrovert, those strange people who feel lonely when alone, which means the opposite is true.

Not at all, because feminists are ideologues, which means you won´t get far. If it is just a label feminist it is a gullible person, otherwis she wouldn´t have been drawn to feminism in the first place. It is much easier to prove a man with gynocentric mindset that you are a "real" man, cuz it is easy to prove that he is not a steadfast advocate for masculinity but for female´s view on masculinity and if he is not gay there is no point in bothering fellow men. In other words if he mocks other guys for not measuring up to his view on masculinity, he should better ask someone else in case you ain´t gay. Therefore you should tell him, that it is not shamefull to want it up the ass but you are straight and he should better lock somewhere else.

No could also mean, "You will pay a premium to get into these hole, so better make an offer." Some pussy beggars are willing to pay any price to cutivate their pussy addiction.

You don´t know whether or not she forgot something to mention, therefore you can only judge her by what has been said. I am always nervous while holding a presentation but that doesn´t mean I spout sophist drivel by making ambiguous statements and using fussy terms. There is nothing bright about it and here is why:

That means 30% is realistic. Yeah, impatience is a choice. You cannot change your brain chemistry, even if you like chatting with chatty forehead, therefore extroverted is a misnomer if it refers to behaviour instead of state of mind. You can be outgoing and chatty while being introverted but you cannot be extroverted, cuz that would mean to recharge while socializing.

It might be hard to find 100 important questions but is is way harder to condense them into 12. In my own experience the average attention span of an extrovert is 25 seconds than they start interrupting you. Most people are extroverts, so acceptance of neurodiversity is important, at least for me. There is no unhealthy food there are only unhealthy amounts of food.