things make sense

Check out @realDonaldTrump's Tweet: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/701868541545295872?s=09 Also http://www.infowars.com/trump-it-is-important-to-audit-the-federal-reserve/ I wonder what Ron/Rand Paul supporters think of this.

Why are you being sarcastic and quoting me out of context? did you even watch the video or do you need me to explain the valid point I was talking about? The previous poster said the myth is "so primitive and so stupid". And I responded with that's not an argument.

If they put labor in a certain geographical location, the product of the labor is theirs. The lady made a valid point (that I sympathize with) that 5000 units of African currency is worth one USD. "So primitive and so stupid" is not a counter-argument.

Just watched it. First time seeing a 50s film. Holy shit... acting was phenomenal and the characters were so believable. I know rape is a contentious topic, but to Stanley's defense, he is just acting in accordance with his values as honestly as he can. When a man loses respect for a woman, he treats her exactly as how he sees her and I think that is how it should be.

a little off topic but I thought it might be useful for some

I don't agree with that. Even if the genders were reversed, I would probably arrive at similar conclusions. I agree with MagnumPI that when two consenting adults are in an abusive relationship, both are at fault. To answer your other question, I think she was attracted to his fame because I think he had something like 6 million subscribers at one point and he was attracted to boobs.

I added more thoughts in my original post

I just discovered this guy and found this conversation very helpful so I wanted to share. I did a quick search on fdr and it seems like no one mentioned this guy yet. Anyway I hope you take something away from it!

I could be wrong, but that guy seems like a full blown psychopath. Pay attention to the emotional manipulative language he used and compare it to her video. "I was in a relationship where I was made to do things".. also, the order in which you watch the videos matter. Watch halfway of the first video and watch the second video all the way and then finish the first. This is what I did. Edit: I have not much more to say, except that I will never really know what happened and that I can only go off of my initial reaction and intuition based on watching the 2 videos you posted. Like someone else mentioned, he had way too many cut scenes and he knew exactly what he was trying to do while he was editing his video. And something tells me he knew exactly what would happen after making the video public. He knew that the fat-shaming lady has a lot of haters already and he probably is aware that there is a growing trend on Youtube promoting men's rights and anti-feminism. Just look at a young white girl uploading a video about why we should all become feminists and look at the like-dislike bar. These kind of videos get shredded by people like Sargon, tldr, Karen Straughn and their followers. A person who purposefully engineers a video to evoke strong emotions from the viewer doesn't seem like a genuine person to me. It's kind of like someone who pretends his personality to gain affection from others. He is trying really hard to make me feel something with his careful video edits and I'm not cool with that at all.

haha you beat me to it!

Thomas Sowell has previously made claims about welfare state destroying the black family. There is a YT video that I watched which suggests that Divorce rates and government spending are not correlated at all. There seems to be a contradiction here. Please watch https://youtu.be/4wpca1ZDIRQ?t=20m13s and let me know your thoughts.

I remember tofu defense and dodge the rapist. Damn that was such a long time ago.. I will forever cherish my moments playing sc-bw and wc3 in my youth.

Wait a minute.... How do we know that the people who attempted to replicate these studies are not biased themselves? This is one of those self-detonating arguments.

If "the authors did not provide enough data to replicate their work", then by definition, that is not good science. So the title of the article "Research that's just too good to be tested" doesn't really make sense. “Aren’t scientists supposed to be competitive? Why aren’t these guys trying to destroy each other?" I'd say no because science is mostly collaborative a process and are driven not by profit but rather, the excitement of uncovering new knowledge. It's a win-win situation if both parties come out with a better understanding of a certain phenomena.

was wondering how difficult it was to find the therapist you have now? I'm still looking for one. I've seen 2 therapists so far Are you satisfied with the level of service? I was very unsatisfied with the service because I didn't feel connected with my therapists. After I said something, I rarely get a response that I want. This could be my problem because it makes it seem like I'm conditioning their response by carefully crafting what I say to them. Where do you live? Mid South Question for y'all How much of the convincing should the therapist be doing to their clients and the clients to their therapists? What % would you assign?