Deil

I'll grant you the playground part, but what about the "even on days with the kids"? Would you say that's just a general restatement? I still don't see why that's a talking point about what to use when you have your kids over... Because if you have them over, wouldn't you want to spend that time not watching TV with or without them?

I was going to make a post of my own, but this is relevant enough. Sling thinks a smart commercial involves regretting having children, so instead you should be watching TV. It starts at 7 seconds. "Playground duty" oh so awful. Wow I can't believe I have to be here! Or near the end of the video(1:05). "Even on days with the kids" so not only does the person have kids, but they're divorced. AND days with the kids? Just watch TV. Whatever. Good job sling.

I appreciate this comment. It's incredible how narrow-sighted people can get on the idea of the vastness of space. I mean I still hear people saying things like, "How did the Voyager not hit one of Jupiter's Moons?" Space is HUGE people! Okay, so Galaxies are huge, but there are clusters of Galaxies too. Woah! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_cluster But wait, there's more! SUPERCLUSTERS. Clusters of Clusters combined! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercluster Wait, wait.... What?! There are superclusters so large that they just call it a GREAT WALL? Seriously. Just leave it to nature to ruin all preconceptions of the size of things. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloan_Great_Wall So there are a tremendous amount of things in space, but there is also a lot of... Space. You know those asteroid field scenes in all those space movies? Dodging and weaving between the things? Well if you flew a ship through our Keiper belt, you would likely not even notice. There's a lot of space between every object in space. Another good example is if we were halfway through the process of colliding with Andromeda, you would also likely not even notice. Pretty cool, eh? I think even if millions of different species had reached a singularity, then I wouldn't be the least bit surprised they didn't even find us, let alone land or fly by our planet.

This statement is posed as if those other factors only change one at a time, or only exist in a vacuum separate from each other.

For you to push aside Alan's link with such ease, Leevan, says something about your constructiveness in this discussion. Also, every fossil you find is a "transition fossil" because every form that ever existed has had a slight difference in everything about it.

Interesting. I'll check it out. Thanks!

Yeah that is pretty funny! I couldn't figure out how to make the search button red too though! Heh heh. You designed the site very well, good job! (I assume also JamesP because it's at the bottom of the page. ) It wasn't very hard to make it look nice when I started with some nice already!

Hey there. I decided to make a stylish for the podcast area because during nighttime it's a huge pain seeing bright white. If you don't know what stylish is then you might be interested in checking it out in the app area for your Web Browser. This is for Mozilla, but it may work for Chrome too. I call it: Stefan's Darkside https://userstyles.org/styles/111359/stefan-s-darkside It's obviously a joke. First thing that came in mind to name it. The only change I want to change is the corners to the logo, but I haven't looked into how to do that yet. I hope someone likes it!

I have a friend in ammunition manufacturing and he said it will likely not go through, and it is probably just to get the product moving quicker. Is the product moving? Yes. The job is done then. No need to actually go forward with it.

Yeah just grow it. It's damned easy. Clearing it federally would be nice. Feds currently can knock anyone outta the business, so this is a step in the right direction.

Randall Carlson has raised enough concern in me to not assert for one side or the other. It's things like this that remind me on topics like this that I shouldn't speak strongly until I research it further.

This is my thought on it. Usurp, please explain how Tyson does not seem like an exception to you. He doesn't live in the projects, he has money and intellect. Here is an excerpt that may even plead against your case, in his own words. Does that sound like an abuser?

Which odds and why?

I think evil is excessive too. If he was literally collecting money with a gun for NASA, sure, but plenty of people advocate taxes for decent things. If someone advocates that more road money should go towards a particular road project, then your money spent on paying for roads would go that way. I'm talking free society right now. If you like NASA, and lots of people do, then your money is going to something you like anyways. If you don't like NASA, then technically more money is being taken from you involuntarily. Personally, I don't mind if more of my taxes head NASA's direction rather than military's.

If they're petty enough over an $8 tip(that they screwed up, intentionally or not), then I don't think I care. Just think of how they likely act in other circumstances if they can't handle something as simple as that.