Matthew Ed Moran

Democrats favored Trump 57% after his address to congress. I don't know how anyone can say leftism is growing stronger or at least isn't decelerating unless they are emotionally triggered. Even if there was some 99% doomsday scenario where leftists win no matter what, what happened to 'better to fight standing then submit to evil on my knees'?

I agree it is definitely an argument in the way you explained it. Thanks for making that more clear (for me at least). I don't know what 'not tolerating' the war on drugs means. I'm not sure why I would to have that conversation with people. When I think what the world most needs to know, the first thing I go to is race and IQ and the effects of multiculturalism. This includes single motherhood and anti white male policies. I talk about that a lot online. The issues of anti white male policies and multiculturalism are really important to me, and it is something that most people are not exposed to in my experience. I don't see the case being made for what it means not to tolerate the war on drugs, and why it is more important to focus on not tolerating it compared to other issues. Maybe there is a good reason for leaving this real world comparison out, but usually when people say "we shouldn't tolerate "x!" and they don't mention: any potential benefits of "x", any alternatives to talking about "x", any past efforts that have already been made to not tolerate "x" and their results (whether positive or negative on net), I assume it is virtue signaling.

Not an argument

I'm sorry about that. It is obviously not a positive experience in the moment, but my suspicion is that your guilt was to warn you what will happen in the future if you don't take action now to become less isolated. I can tell you first hand that experiencing guilt is a luxury compared to lacking conscience. I think anybody who has ignored their guilt will tell you the same thing. Even without knowing the specific response they gave you besides what you told me, I know that the isolation you felt was inflicted by their choice to respond to you in a way that would specifically disconnect you from your emotions. When you have a significant emotional experience and your parents do not reciprocate, that is a deeply isolating experience. If you can find a good support group or therapist, I think that will provide the opposite type of experience and make your emotions vital. I think any human contact with people who are more concerned with your well being than your parents will act against your isolation.

Your certainty regarding your priorities may be correct, but I am not sure how you know. There is frankly no such thing as distance from your abusers. You have probably spent about 20 years with their personalities inhabiting your developing mind. That influence it is not going to fade. When you leave the abuse, what you will experience is neglect. The negative experience can be used as a powerful incentive to enter therapy. If you think therapy would be useful for you and you can afford it, then you will have a more confident transition towards independence getting it earlier rather than later. It is like you are saying "I can only go to the hospital once I get away from the place of my injury." Maybe there is a specific reason why you need to leave your place of injury first, but ideally you would be conscious of it and able to understand the costs and benefits.

The mainstream (communist) media (news, entertainment, academia) is the single worst influence on American society. Trump is constantly exposing how they lie over and over. The people who say "Trump lies too!" or "Media doesn't lie in "x" case!" are aiding the mainstream (communist) media. All politicians lie more than Trump, and the media's lies are infinitely more harmful than their truths, so it is a terrible idea to focus on these things given the opportunity costs. Aiding the mainstream communist media is the worst practical action one can take, because there is no greater force for communism, and there is nothing worse than communism. This doesn't mean someone can't criticize Trump, but if they don't have a track record of integrity in this battle, then most people will rightfully lump them in with the communists - and they will naturally become defensive to criticism in the future. Its not their fault for becoming defensive - it's the fault of the people who lack integrity when making their arguments.

It only applies to people who initiate emotionally manipulative non arguments (which you didn't do). Here is an second attempt Sitting in a bucket, ripples under his ass Raining from the clouds, splashing on his face He calls the world misguided This is a post modern poem which means I took 3 minutes to write it and I will sell you the privilege of reading it for your entire net worth. Hold on French title incoming. You will need to take a loan out on your kids future before you can pay for this baby Here is my postmodern interpretation of your poem which is probably only 1/100th amusing to anyone else as it is to me: A man says "there is a bridge!" He walks off a cliff.

I have a poem. People who make emotionally manipulative non arguments are full of crap.

Not an argument - bunch of emotional words. "It's not as if I'm a leftist troll posting complete garbage.​" Garbage is a bit harsh - emotionally manipulative non arguments.

If the bullet had hit someone and injured them, then your parents, the police, the victim and his/her family all easily could have ganged up against you. Your parents would have tried to convince everyone in the scenario, including you, that they had no responsibility for your actions. Seeing your vulnerability as a potential source suffering for them, they would have tried to blame you for what you were exposed to in their parenting that led to this point. This would have had such a drastic negative effect on you, with no one else in your life to tell you how you were being made a scapegoat by your parents for their irresponsibility and neglect, to isolate from yourself to the point of despair. You would have loathed yourself because everyone would have told you this mistake was isolated and easily avoidable, and had no connection to anything that was done in the past to you. They wouldn't have even needed to say anything to you to do this. Just their silence would have communicated to you that you were responsible for the consequences of their past wrongdoing, and as punishment you had to suffer shame for their fear that you would act as they taught you.

I think what you are saying in the first part is this: "You are being emotionally reactive" I think my criticism was not an argument, and was also passive aggressive because of particular weasel phrases I used. If I were going to rephrase it, I would have stated more boldly: "I think it is rude to suggest someone is making a mistake without providing reason or evidence to back it up" However, this is still not an argument that I'm making. Also, one definition of mistake is 'a judgement that something is misguided,' in which case I cannot even say in good faith Rose's judgment is objectively incorrect. I think a more sincere approach would have been to ask Rose for clarification. (Rose's) Above are some examples of weasel language: posing questions to someone else about my own subjective opinions, giving insincere or hasty apologies to relieve anxiety, and playing victim were a few of the examples of what I think are weasel approaches of debating a point with someone else. It is important for me to work on getting rid of this type of language from my vocabulary because good people will be justifiably revolted, and bad people will use it to their personal advantage by attacking the weakness and submission that I offer in my position.

For some people, it is to combat the anti white male propaganda and disarm the media in its attempts to indoctrinate children towards being paradoxes of completely certain nihilistic relativists who can easily be used to destroy respect for the rule of law, western tradition of limited government, conservative approaches to social change, and in group preference among whites - and institute a tornado of social disruption to displace them with communist totalitarianism - by appealing to their all-enlightened vain and impulse driven desires for sex, responsibility free hatred, and sadistic humor (I'm looking at you, SNL). If I could make that sentence longer I would. For other people, it is to minimize all attempts to do this and insert passive aggressive cynicism against all who try and do, by bogging them down with insincere questions and an attitude of intellectual entitlement whenever they are unconvinced of something.

As far as I understand from all the evidence I've been exposed to from the show and have experienced, you can't magically disarm major anxiety in the moment. You can act on the anxiety - but you can't just make it go away. You've already tried a number of things and failed regarding this approach, so I think this might be evidence that the next thing you do consistent with this approach won't work. You said this is the most certain attraction you've had compared to ambivalent interactions you've had in the past - but it seems to me that everything you have shared since your last interaction with her, including your choice to write this post, signal ambivalence!!! Instead of trying to get rid of the anxiety, you could act on it. You could approach and commit to being as honest and genuine as possible with her, and continue doing that until you have some certainty regarding how you feel. If you don't​ achieve any certainty about how you feel around her no matter how much you try, then I would think this is strong evidence one of you is not being honest or open in the conversation and a relationship isn't going to be possible. If you feel increased anxiety the more you interact with her, and you still desire her, then the theory that seems to make sense to me is that you're following this simple equation: EGGS! > your positive feelings interacting with her. (Is she pretty?) If you feel positive around her, then fantastic! Then you can continue to figure out why the !&$# she voted for Hillary Clinton! These are hopefully not just my opinions and are consistent with what has been said on the show! I could be totally​ wrong in characterizing your situation. Please take it with a grain of salt if you're inclined to!

https://selfknowledgedaily.com/how-to-hit-on-a-woman-6bca1582b5d1#.qtcyn2r92 hope this helps

going to drop out of conversation after looking at your post history. I'm embarrassed