Tweak

Well I have to say that I understand your dilemma and even tough a post I made some time ago doesnt answer your question I wish that you read it for your own sake and maybe you have some help in the manner. https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/43842-the-rational-behind-having-children-and-pets/#entry400480

Well, you ask why not? Might I start by stating some reasons FOR nationalism to start with. I think my message will become more clear if I state some reasons in support for nationalism to shed some light on the issues at hand. Explanations and pros regarding Nationalism: Nations as we have today are the results of western- european heads of, well, regions coming to terms over new regions. Nation states. Some say it was a treaty but it was actually a prolonged talks with over 200 delegates. Anyway it was a way to balance power since Europe had witnessed so much war. National interest, foreign policy etc.. The west I have to say have had some to do with how the rest of the world operates. On a nation state basis. "In the before times" kings, emperors, well rulers have operated on a "im one with God, the center of the universe" ond so on. Actually, France was perhaps one of the countries perfecting statecraftship to more or less what we have today. Actually it was more or less one man obviously a stratigigist who started the process and was a man of the church. The reason I personally find nationalism to be a beacon of light is because it creates a balance of power. Over the times, many wars have been fought coz of different people have been subjected to believes, laws and many other things that does not go hand and hand with their culture. The same problem exists today in states themselves tough it is not to the same extent. Just look at the people here in europe and the opposition to the EU. Not only does it create a balance of power but it creates a shorter hand if you will. What I mean by that is the fact that it is easier to make a change. However in my personal research I have found that nation states- (many are now just nations) are more or less governed by the same kind of people and in fact the very same people. Witch is not odd in my personal view. Who has the most in common? A billionaire in the UK and a farmer in the UK or a billionaire in the UK and the US? I think any rational person would know the answer to that question. Okay so now to the downside of nationalism: No matter how noble you might find for example Donald Trump he is in fact just like everybody else. What do I mean by that? He is the man who is trying to have other people subservient to him. To become the commander inb chief. Commanding you. The problem with this is that he is representing an area ei. the USA. In the US there are over 300 million people. Not everyone voted for him. The truth is that only the majority decides your destiny. So if 51 % thinks that you shouldnt eat potatoes you can no longer do that... () The cold hard truth of the matter is that if everybody had the "american spirit" they would not need a commander. Nor the laws to enforce the "values" of the american people. If everybody under this region (the US) had the same attitudes and so on there would be no reason for laws or a commander. Also when it comes to leaders and their parties they have a very dangerous element witch is the element of ambiguity. When ever you have ambiguity like for example Donald Trump states that he wants to make america great again. Ambiguity is something all leaders and their parties have and this makes a lot of room for radicalism. It is almost a kind of must. Coz if you as a leader lay out exactly what you want to do, not as many people would follow. When you have ambiguity as a leader you can rely on you charms and let the people in question fill in the gaps in order to feel like they belong to something (you the leader).

You are looking through the lens of totalitarianism. In a free society (anarcho- capitalism) the woman could choose to have an insurance if you will, towards bad judgement for her not choosing the right man to provide for her. You are not deep. You are a regurgitation of all media input when it comes to family, gender and so on. The choice is up to the women. It has nothing of convincing to do. When it comes to the increase in wealth for couples when they both work... Well the only reason you would feel the need, financially, for both of you and your wife to work is coz the banking industry together with the mighty state have made the situation in witch you and your hypothetical family live in. In an anarcho- capitalist society I can easily see you, wife and child living together in a house with white pigged fence.

It seems like I do not understand your post. Would you please elaborate so that I can fully understand the post and give a proper answer.

I have a theory. The basis of my theory goes in hand with the fact that most anarcho- capitalists come from a (term used broadly) right wing basis. When it comes to politics, right wingers are the ones most keen to underscore the problematics of immigration.

I moved to London 1.5 weeks ago and ive only met one brit so far...

How can blaming an entire race for something be in the "right direction"? All they do in that show is to try to be the underdog. I dont care if all other white people did something bad yesterday. I will not tolerate being blamed for anything other people may or may not have done. All this creates is an underachieving culture with whiney people, competing on future entitlements from the government. Because that is all you will be able to do in the future when you spend you time like this.

How do I know? Well as I told you in the previous post I have studied them for 3-4 years. If I´m lumping them all together? Well yes I do. On speculation? Both yes and no. Some things I can only speculate in. However my answer to you is solely based on facts. Different organisation that use the name freemason? Well you have different lodges. They can differ in some ways depending on the country. But freemasons are freemasons. I assume you are an anarchist and an anarchist who wants to join a lodge is almost as funny as an anarchist joining the church. It always does. I have not had any discussion online in some years. It never goes anywhere. The topic is enormous. Simply put it you have 2 groups of people when it comes to this. Those who will arrive at the conclusion that the masons are responsible for the everything, much like a God is to religious people and then those who say that it´s just people getting together. Both groups are wrong. And this was my last post in this topic! Over and out:)

I have spent the last 3-4 years studying secrete societies and I live right across of a lodge used by multiple societies. When I was a taxi driver I used to drive them to and from their gatherings. Would you be a part of a church because of their moral values? Just like the church the masons values are based in pretty muddied waters. To be honest with you, if you seek to better yourself to become a moral person I suggest you do that elsewhere. Those people are far from moral.

Hello! Just finished som last tweaks on my new non-profit website. It is going to be updated with new material from time to time. It is meant for you guys to study the workings of government leading you to be better able to protect yourself. The website is: www.subversiveactivities.net I hope that some will find it useful.

I know that there is a lot of talk about the "rights" (rights where are you!XD) in regard to the gays getting married. I don´t understand why on earth the gays work so hard with big daddy the state into making them be part of it. If I were gay I would´nt want to join a club witch expresses that it does not want to have anything to do with me. Secondly It is a damn shame to elevate the power of the state like this. I think 1MFi is wrong that this somehow shows that the government is reducing it´s control because once again it has shown us that it needs to be the one making the decisions. Besides it has been a tremendous amounts of different little brothers of the state such as NGO: s and think tanks supported with private donations AND our tax dollars, working in tandem with the state do make this happen. Far from all people in the US wished for this to happen and ignored their wishes. The state once again shows a lack of respect for the individual. Oppression of the few to make room for the state is getting old. Remember the state granted this "right" this unfortunately only shows us how little power we have. If the state disappears in my lifetime you gays can be part of my club, everyone is welcome except for statists!

Misspost

If you found this interesting I suggest you read a book called "Magnificent mind at any age". http://www.amazon.com/Magnificent-Mind-Any-Age-Potential/dp/0307339106/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1431373463&sr=8-1&keywords=beautiful+mind+at+any+age

The only way for the UK to leave the EU will be if they put in place a "shadow EU" where the elite can continue to prosper. Every time a party in Europe gains momentum they become less and less critical of the monster EU. Most of the things will not change its more like: "Would you like me to wear a blue or red T- shirt while I spank you" thing...

Did not mean to post...