kriskanya

Again, I think the issue is that it seems like virtuous women (read: people) seem to be in extremely short supply. To answer your suggestion: I've already tried this---I moved to Nashville to escape the vacuous women of Los Angeles. My experience has been that down here there are either the born-and-raised Southern girls who love God, football, guns, etc. and don't have a wide range of interests, there are the Bernie-supporting left-wing hipsters/musicians, and there are transplants (many from the Midwest). I know these are stereotypes, but they remarkably seem to ring true. I've dated all three: the first group doesn't take well to my (benign) atheism (I tell them I do have secular morality and don't necessarily mind religion, but no dice), the politics/life outlook of the second group always leads to intractable arguments (I once had a girl lecture me for an hour about gender being a social construct and proceeded into a 15-minute anti-Rand rant---I should've walked out), and the last group seems to be simply unremarkable (in my experience). Not to mention that Southern fare does not do favors for ladies' waistlines, and immediately disqualifies part of the pool. I would have absolutely loved to get Stef's view/suggestions on this matter. It seems like the dating market is completely broken.

I don't think it's fair for Stef to place the majority of the blame on the caller's shortcomings (if you want to call the pursuit of women for sex and companionship in the short term until you find a virtuous mate a "shortcoming"). The question he raises is a valid one: where does an FDR man find such virtuous women? Also, when will women wake up and realize they can't have their cake and eat it too? I get it: Stef's wife, child, friends, and some female callers are virtuous, but that's anecdotal to the same extent as the caller's experiences with women are. Actually, the caller's anecdotal evidence is borne out by the framework the two of them discuss earlier in the call, in the context of women's hypergamy run wild with the pill and free stuff from the State. I've had a very similar experience to the caller, and so have several of my friends in NYC, SF, and LA. I know that doesn't qualify as extensive evidence, but it does fit the mold they lay out early in the call. I mean, how many of the guys listening to this show simply want a non-feminist, non-Bernie or Hillary supporting, good-looking, in-shape, kind, relatively-intelligent women who simply won't pull his wallet out through his testicles? I'll bet there are a lot of them, and they have a lot of trouble finding such a woman in this day and age. I'm sure most guys were enthralled (as I was) with that wicked smart black female from a recent show---precisely because she's such a rarity! Even if that male caller was flawed (Stef definitely jumped to some unsubstantiated conclusions here), why couldn't he just separate the wheat from the chaff and answer the question? Tell us to date a Christian woman because religion is less worse than moral relativism. Tell us to do the MGTOW thing and preserve our souls for the right women. I mean, anything would be better than simply smearing the guy.