whole2th

Why are there calls for arresting Snowden for his leaks featured in the news and the voices of those who call for Hillary's arrest for leaks of classified materials are muted?

"Leaks" are equal to "distractions"--providing the appearance that something is being done about Big Brother tyranny. http://mashable.com/2014/06/05/edward-snowden-revelations/#yh26rTEasiqL None of these ten "leaks" have produced tangible change in the surveillance activity. We don't know who controls the surveillance. We can't vote them out of their positions. We have no options for communicating to large groups of people in order to organize our views outside of these systems which are monitored. Julian Assange endorsed Snowden. Here is what Julian Assange says about 9-11 activists: "His obsession with secrecy, both in others and maintaining his own, lends him the air of a conspiracy theorist. Is he one? “I believe in facts about conspiracies,” he says, choosing his words slowly. “Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It’s important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there’s enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news.” What about 9/11? “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.” What about the Bilderberg conference? “That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their meeting notes.” Predicated on 9-11 narratives, wars continue to be launched. Assange, Snowden, now Panama--circuses to keep us thinking there is a better day on the horizon.