Jump to content

ProhibitionKilz

Member
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

Everything posted by ProhibitionKilz

  1. How is an algorithm an imitation of biology or what are algorithms analogous to in biology?
  2. So an imitation is more intelligent simply because it doesn't need sleep? I must disagree...the statement, "human level AI" contradicts your hypothesis & implies a limit at human level. I can see how an AI would have superior intellect but not intelligence.
  3. Would it be able to create new theories...if so how?
  4. How is it even theoretically possible for artificial intelligence to exceed the intelligence of man? I can see how it may be more intelligent than most but not all.
  5. Ill look into Georgian thank you for your input. This topic is important to me because there is an injustice created in society by the idea of landed property, while the person has every right to any improvement they have made upon the land, naturally we are all co-owners of the earth & ought to be given something from the land that would provide us sustenance naturally. When most or all of the land in a given society is owned by persons they are already at an advantage compared to an orphan or person born into poverty & as Thomas Paine argues any person ought to be better off being born into society than they would be if they were born in nature. This creates a form of indentured servitude to those with landed property that in part shouldn't exist for in nature we could use the land's produce to survive. I have only read Paine's Agrarian Justice & applied my own thoughts to it, it is his plan in my words for the most part. Justice to me means many things depending upon context. Righting a wrong is the most general definition for me. In the title of my post righting a wrong in societie's current precedent using principles from the nature of people & societies. It is my opinion there is no justice for harm already done on a personal level excepting perhaps genuine correction of the wrong person's behavior & understanding.
  6. Land ought to be rented out to owners of property residing upon them for naturally we are all co-owners of the earth. For the sake of Justice, an initial one-time 50% of an established equal land value to be paid into a General fund by current owners of landed property. I.e. if I had a house 40% paid off I would owe 20% & the other owner 30%(of the land's value only). Afterwards for the sake of being able to live free, land rent ought to be 20% of the land value to be paid after current property owner’s death by the fortunate that inherit the renters property. Renters that die without anyone to inherit their property shall be auctioned off to the public & added to the General Fund. Natural resources sold by land renters shall pay 50% of their profits into the General Fund. The General Fund shall be distributed monthly & equally to all citizens 21 years of age & over for social security. Unclaimed funds shall be added back into the General Fund after 31 days. A simple plan as such would end hunger, homelessness, petty crime & add security for the wealthy in society. Special circumstances easily handled by civil courts. Equal opportunity would be a reality & expensive social programs unnecessary. If you can, tell me why this would not work.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.