Although Stefan at times proclaims his atheism - as well as his anarchism - it may not be of the kind that is generally understood by this term. I venture to say that - as a public personality - he is not socially helpful by asserting such (quite aside that it is not logically tenable). Claiming to be an Aristotalian (vs a Platonian) at best puts him on a slippery slope - as it unfortunately did its originator; Aristotle never denied the existence of the gods, he just positioned them (illogically) into the background of one's consciousness whereas Plato made them upfront logically obligatory for all of life's recourse.
To reduce the precision of the Universe's matrix as either accidental or of secondary importance is not only illogical - it either is or it is not - it is sociologically totally irresponsible and thus may be arrived at under the mental influence of the dark forces (who are there to ever derail or obstruct humanity's evolution). Only an outright commitment to Spirit's (scientific and logical) primacy (e.g. as during the Ancient Egyptian empire) will allow the evolution of humanity to proceed rhythmically and harmoniously. Until such will have been restored, mankind will have to groan under the heavy load of self-delusion. That does not mean having to unquestioningly accept the equally spurious claims of the various official religions - let only the Truth of pure Logic be our guide.
Otherwise we have to resort to the lengthy and complicated psychological investigations that Stefan is a master at - but that are exhaustively insufficient for all minds of a lesser capacity. Both the Buddha and the Christ would have shuddered - of course I realise, that Stefan most likely does not give credence to either their factual existence or their importance.