GoodJBoy

Does the existence of things like DNA and the ability for the body to repair itself and gravity point to the existence of a higher form of intelligence?

I was in the almost same situation as you. I made a list of what I was looking for in a woman and realized that kind of woman probably did not exist. Rather than simply giving up, I researched where such women with the qualities I was seeking existed and then I went there, found myself a wonderful wife and now have a wonderful nuclear family where I am the provider and my wonderful wife dedicates herself to raising our children. This happened over decades. What I realized was that in the secular world, what you are looking for is hard to find and if you do find, it might be unstable. In the religious worlds, women can be found like you described in abundance. Now you need to ask yourself, if religions can produce great quality women in abundance while the secular society produces messed up head cases in abundance, why would you not be interested in exploring religions?

By definition, G-d is the cause of existence of something. I believe there is One G-d that is the cause of existence of time, space, matter, energy, and everything. As such, He is not subject to this qualities but defines them. As such, He is not to be found in time or space or matter or energy but His Revelations of "His Character" are found there. If you shall ask me to proof it to you, I will ask you to proof me wrong. lol I believe and try to have faith in G-d. For those who believe in G-d, He is obviously and purposely keeping His existence a mystery that is currently impossible to proof.

Life is like dungeons and dragons where Intelligence, Wisdom, Charisma and Alignment (good, neutral, evil in character)are totally separate from one another. You can have a brilliant, unwise, evil, uncharismatic hermit in that game and you can also have that in real life.

Here is a theory about the current liberal agenda: Goal: Isolate and pit people against one another in order to divide and conquer humanity. Ideology: Human groupings only have value when being labeled as villains and victims; otherwise, identifying as a member of a group is playing pretend and one can therefore identify as any member of any group, even as an animal. A "person" is just a meaningless, mortal, spiritual entity (nihilism). Conceptions of culture and nationalism (e.g. I am a father/mother/son/daugher or I am American/Mexican/Russian/Whatever or I am a Jew/Christian/Muslim/Whatever) have no meaning or purpose. There is just isolation and insecurity. Divide and conquer... The liberal agenda... Comments, questions, concerns? :-)

A woman is surely capable of cutting down her man with a look or with words but it is much more difficult for her to do to a normal guy (not an wussy guy though). Normal men do this kind of thing without even trying because women are much more sensitive to this. That's one big difference.

From horrible relationships to wonderful relationships, from the most unintelligent to the most brilliant, from the greatest wall of silence to the greatest conversationalists, there is only one department that a husband rules over his wife in. The Bible was not saying that the husband is a general while the wife is a private and that he rules every department in her life. A husband rules over his wife's emotions. With one sentence or act, a man can easily raise up or cut down his wife. A women's level of happiness and fulfillment in life is largely a direct reflection of the energy her husband shines upon her. This is not the case for husbands. This is exactly what the Bible is talking about here. That's not my personal opinion but what my religion has taught me.

Flirting with women in the workplace is flirting with big trouble. Make friends with the guys and keep it professional with the unprofessional gals. I remember seeing an attractive girl who would go and talk to this poor guy about Howard Stern and all kinds of sex jokes. One day, he comes up to her and brings up a Howard Stern subject and she decides that she was offended and went straight to HR. Next day he was escorted out although he was a great guy and a hard working productive employee. With that said, marriage is a good thing for a man. Working with women in the workplace is a bad thing for men.

The deeper question is, what does Adam rule over in regards to Eve? In every family, what one universal thing does a man rule over his wife in a normal healthy relationship? To find the answer, finish this sentence husbands... I rule over my wife's...

Thanks for sharing BITCHUTE.COM. This website looks like exactly what I am looking for.

if you are wondering why I made the title "Internet C E N S O R S H I P", it would not let me do "Internet Censorship" because of the profanity filter... lol

It appears that the major players in the internet are left wing extremists (Google, Twitter, YouTube, FaceBook, etc.) and since they are corporate entities who are now openly censoring people, I do not wish to give them my internet attention nor my money. As such, I am looking to alternatives to these services and am planning on trying to not use their services anymore. One of my issues is that I enjoy listening to Stefan on YouTube. Because I feel my viewership of YouTube is fueling the left wing extremists, I do not want to view anything on it anymore. I want to boycott Google, Twitter, YouTube, etc... any company that pulls their big brother strings on conservatives. Should I do this even though I will not be listening to Stefan anymore? Should we all be doing this? What are you thoughts?

What caused this issue? A fatherless mentally ill boy on psyche meds exposed to decades of violence in movies and video games. Where are the fathers? Hollywood and the government pushed many of them out of the home. And the answer the media (who helped promote these mass murders) is that we should all give up our guns because the FBI was too incompetent to locate this kid and investigate him even though they have had hundreds of agents too busy chasing after the Russian investigation.

Let's look at this in three different categories... 1. Mechanical Engineer dedicates his entire career to creating new weapons for the military used to kill people. 2. A billionaire businessman civilian that has nothing to do with the military and is paying hundreds of millions of dollars a year to the government in the form of income tax, a large portion of which is used to buy weapons for war. 3. Psychologist this is going to get a 4 month internship conducting research, transcribing, conducting interviews and analysis for the military. My vote is that taking this internship is just fine. It's not like you are going to be enabling some sociopathic leader to kill more people by taking this job. Down the line, this job just might give you some valuable perspective on the military that is going to keep your children steering clear of ever joining the military.

Can something create itself? If it did not exist, how can it create?

"A narcissist is someone who fails to realize that I am the center of the universe."

The existence of horrible and very painful seemingly unjust events in the world does not prove or disprove the existence of G-d. Let me try to explain what I am trying to say with more clarity... Is there a country called the United States of America? Is there a president of that country? What is his or her name? For sane people, the above three questions have clearly correct and incorrect answers. For those same sane people, there is currently no clear simple argument that renders the same level of clarity regarding the existence of G-d. If such an argument existed, all sane people would clearly agree. The existence of G-d is thus a mystery for mankind in our current state.

Being a very religious person myself who strongly believes in G-d, I just want to say that in this world now, it is obviously not possible for sane people to put forth simple arguments that prove or disprove G-d's existence.

These are just initial thoughts on this subject: If a man sets his goals in life so that he can self actualize according to his personal essence and he decides that getting married and having a wife and children is an important goal and he decides that staying happily married is also an important goal, avoiding pornography would be a good thing. Having positive, physical, and spiritually bonding relations with ones wife in marriage helps keep the marriage strong and healthy. Porn lowers a husband's desire for his wife and veers men away from having positive relations with his wife. Typically, a husband involved in watching porn will have relations with his wife less often and when he does have relations with her, she will be more like a public urinal or a "war captive for the taking" to him rather than his soul mate. A typical wife who is not having positive, bonding relations is often left feeling bad about herself even when she orgasms. Instead of feeling uplifted and spiritually joined with her husband, the wife of a porn addicted husband is often left feeling degraded. She may feel more like a war captive devoured by an enemy soldier rather than wife who is loved by her husband. Porn leads to less physical relations and less meaningful relations for a husband and wife. Porn = loss of opportunity to strengthen a marriage. And if you are not married yet but your goal is to get married eventually, porn is addictive and will setup a future husband for the above troubles. By nature, men are extremely sexual and porn to men is similar in some ways like crack to a crack addict. It is obvious that crack will totally destroy one's life but the dangers of porn are not so obvious but they can be just as destructive as crack. Spiritually speaking, for typical husbands and future husbands, watching porn causes husband and wife to swim in their own feces rather than have loving relations.

Who here is devastated that there might have been something very sinister and outright evil going on behind the pure and innocent "Charles in Charge" show from years gone by? Hollywood took a society whose girls valued waiting for marriage and made a lot of money off of turning it into an altered society whose girls were brainmind programmed to value premarital sex as a form of women's empowerment and freedom. Both Scott and Nicole made lots of money promoting these kinds of values and this controversy is their just desserts. They and Hollywood as a whole have caused many women's marriages to suffer and fail and caused there to be many more lonely older women who never got married and never had a family. For the vast majority of women, getting married and having children is the best way to self actualize in life. It's like building a huge community pool with ping pong and high dives and deep ends and lovely manicured lawns and advertising for everyone in the whole world to come and swim but the problem is that they filled the pool with sewerage. They got lots of people to come and swim in the sewerage and they themselves swam in the sewerage. Now it is 28 years later and they are wallowing in their own feces and both are now crying to the world, "I'm a victim!"