Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Antifragile'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Freedomain Topics
    • General Messages
    • Current Events
    • Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
    • Atheism and Religion
    • Philosophy
    • Self Knowledge
    • Peaceful Parenting
    • Men's Issues, Feminism and Gender
    • Education
    • Science & Technology
    • Reviews & Recommendations
    • Miscellaneous
  • Freedomain Media Content
    • New Freedomain Content and Updates
    • General Feedback
    • Freedomain Show Lists
    • Technical Issues
  • Freedomain Listener Corner
    • Introduce Yourself!
    • Meet 'n Greet!
    • Listener Projects
    • Community Reference Information

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


AIM


Gallery URL


Blog URL


Location


Interests


Occupation

Found 1 result

  1. I'm new to this forum, and relatively new to anarchism. I just recently read Everyday Anarchy and Practical Anarchy by Stefan Molyneux. One of the other critical facets on my intellectual journey from minarchism to anarchism was a book that I read over a year ago called Antifragile: How to Live in a World We Don't Understand by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. I did a search of the forum and found that this topic hasn't yet been discussed, but I've found it to be a powerful distinction or framework when thinking about complex systems. Antifragile is a description for systems that gain from disorder or volatility. This is distinct from other descriptors such as "strong" or "robust" which describe systems that are merely indifferent to disorder or volatility. For example a single restaurant is a very fragile system, their failure rate is very high, but the system of all restaurants in a given region is antifragile since the failure of each restaurant gives valuable information to the rest of the restaurants about what doesn't work. Another example is evolution where the failures individuals in a species often prevents those individuals from reproducing, and thus causing subsequent generations in the species to lack those qualities that caused failure. So how does this relate to Anarchy? Governments appear to be antifragile since any time there is disorder or volatility in society they pass more laws or dictates which allow them grow and take "control" over a larger portion of human interaction. However, they cannot control human interaction, they can only set up barriers. Each barrier is supposed to be to prevent some failure from occurring. If it succeeds in preventing a specific type of failure from occurring, then that whole system becomes more fragile. If it fails (typically the case) to prevent that failure from occurring, then it still makes the overall system more fragile because barriers have two sides and consequently prevent others from entering or succeeding. For example "Too Big to Fail" policies give an unfair advantage to large banks over small ones, and a high minimum wage prevents lower skilled workers from entering the labor force. This is only meant to be an introduction to the topic. There are many fascinating applications of this concept discussed in the book. I'll post a video that goes through some of that. I found the first 3 minutes of this video incomprehensible, so you may want to skip ahead. http://youtu.be/iEnmjMgP_Jo?t=3m
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.