Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'FEC'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Freedomain Topics
    • General Messages
    • Current Events
    • Libertarianism, Anarchism and Economics
    • Atheism and Religion
    • Philosophy
    • Self Knowledge
    • Peaceful Parenting
    • Men's Issues, Feminism and Gender
    • Education
    • Science & Technology
    • Reviews & Recommendations
    • Miscellaneous
  • Freedomain Media Content
    • New Freedomain Content and Updates
    • General Feedback
    • Freedomain Show Lists
    • Technical Issues
  • Freedomain Listener Corner
    • Introduce Yourself!
    • Meet 'n Greet!
    • Listener Projects
    • Community Reference Information

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


AIM


Gallery URL


Blog URL


Location


Interests


Occupation

Found 1 result

  1. I hope I've posted this in the right place. I recently heard about the 2010 Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC, which dealt with regulations on how much organizations could spend on political campaign spending. I really don't know much about the case, other than it was decided in favor of corporations having no limitations on campaign spending, but it wasn't long after looking it up that I stumbled across this Youtube video: http://youtu.be/k5kHACjrdEY, which is the subject of my post. I understand that corporations aren't angels of the free market by any stretch of the imagination, but this video was extremely biased and its animation was a pretty poor representation of reality. My problems with the video are the glorification of democracy, the use of completely one-sided animation (pretty propagandistic, if you ask me), and the use of polls as if they're fact ("85% of Americans believe X"). Oh, and when you're finished with the video, look at the description: "And, for all you fact checker out there," (I guess there's only one fact checker) accompanied by a link that literally is just a description of the video and credits. So... no sources. Beautiful. I was wondering what you all think of this video. Happy to hear what you think.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.