Stefan, you make the argument for Free Choice aren't you making the argument against Science as it uses Determinism as one of its assumptions?
It is interesting to me that a number psychological scientists (yes, they do exist) are attracted to the Free Choice/Determinism debate. One example is Carl Rogers and you can learn more about that in his book Becoming A Person. If you don't believe, logically, in freedom of choice then you can't believe in morality, can you, because your actions are determined, no matter what one tries to do to change?
Is not the basic premise of Science, Determinism?
It also interesting to me that Stefan is very interested in conscience/unconsciousness science of the mind and not the behaviorist type of psychological science. For one that is so into proving his philosophical precepts via very basic and limited premises or assumptions and then lets his assumptions when it comes to psychological science to be so less concrete.