Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'Free will nap determinism ste'.
Found 1 result
-
In his 3-part video about free will, Stefan said that if we don't have free will (which I don't believe we do, but that's another discussion), then the non-aggression principle would be meaningless. Why is that? Aren't the consequences of our actions the defining part? So if a man has an outset of schizophrenia and he catches a very contagious and dangerous disease, and he's living in his own fantasy world where he thinks he's perfectly healthy, isn't he violating the NAP by walking among other people, probably contaminating them? Don't they have the right to lock him in some sort of safehouse where he can't contaminate people?
