Search the Community

We have seen the result of mass migration of low IQ demographic in Europe and the chaos that followed. But it seems that Canada doesn't learn from the mistakes of others or from its passed mistakes. In 2010, Quebec received a massif migration from Haiti. Harper didn't like Quebeckers and he tried to replace the demographic. These low IQ, no skills, migrants did not integrate well in our society. Very soon, some neighbourhoods lived in fear from hostile black gangs. They used intimidation on the population, sold drugs, brutalised people, forced women in prostitution and commited murders. This was in the northern part of Montreal, a place where honest labourers with little money lived. People that didn't have the money to move. At the end of his term, Harper decided to prosecute and deport some migrants, but the damage to our society was done. Now Trudeau is calling for all of the illegal migrants in the USA to come to Canada. And what do you know, the people from Haiti are coming to Montreal where the Maire Codere said it was a sanctuary city. They stuffed all these people in the stadium, which is a 5 minutes walk from where I live. We know very well that criminality will explode in the neighbourhood very soon. Seriously, I'm starting to fucking lose it. Everyone in this province has had a piece of their brain removed at birth or something. Everyone in this province is a lefty. Everyone is a fucking socialist. No one sees the shit storm around the corner. They see the shit going on in Europe and they put their blindfold on. They reject reality and substitute their own. I regularly hear people say that it is not so bad if new laws are imposed on us that restrict speech. They dont care, they just dont care. I swear, when I'm finished with university, I'm moving south of the border, I'm purchasing the biggest riffle I can find and I'm dip my bullets in pork fat. There is an epic shit storm that is going to fall on Canada and these r type morons wont know what hit them.

Thread for posting links to, and discussion of immigration related crimes in Sweden. https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/viewer?mid=1chA4hWXfmlPvkhm5gpTkMCb1XDQ&hl&ll=64.61136893599594%2C5.812402550000002&z=4

should women (criminal) have harsher sentencing than men due to the fact they can have children or is there an answer why this would be wrong?

Do you guys know the study that Stef mentions saying that almost all violent criminals were abused as children? A few articles I found quote these numbers 14% of all men in prison in the USA were abused as children. 36% of all women in prison were abused as children. Thanks!

"Daniel Reisel searches for the psychological and physical roots of human morality. Full bio He studies the brains of criminal psychopaths (and mice). And he asks a big question: Instead of warehousing these criminals, shouldn't we be using what we know about the brain to help them rehabilitate? Put another way: If the brain can grow new neural pathways after an injury … could we help the brain re-grow morality?" http://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_reisel_the_neuroscience_of_restorative_justice About 15 mins My first thought was that this would make a fascinating FDR interview. There is some discussion in the video comments as well. This snippet encompasses much of it, IMO: Emma McCreary I think you are doing some important work, and I don't doubt that you've had several success stories. A lot of times people just need to be exposed to a better way of living. At the same time, though, I must disagree with you that "It's not too late for anyone." That's wishful thinking, plain and simple. There are some people that it is just too late for, and this is not a matter of opinion at this point with our current technology and medical capabilities. Look at someone with a traumatic injury who has had damage to their amygdala. They may have once been pillars of their community but then they become extremely aggressive and unpredictable. You can't restore them to their former selves, barring a medical miracle on the horizon, any more than you can make someone with down syndrome an MIT graduate. It's just not going to happen, and no amount of social programming is going to change people with an underdeveloped or damaged amygdala--such as psychopaths/sociopaths. There have been cases, like with Jill Bolte Taylor (also a TED speaker), who've been able to repair the damage done to their brains after a stroke, but I know of not one case in the scientific literature of a rehabilitated psychopath. Ergo, for now, such a thing should be appropriately placed in the "very highly improbable to impossible" category.

What do you guys think about libel or defamation laws? I think most if not everyone will agree that yelling fire in a crowded theater should be considered a crime. What about intentionally lying about someone in a way that affects their livelihood? I am thorn on this. I am more on the side of no speech crime unless it creates immediate danger to people.

Should things like buying goods from a thief or watching child porn be illegal? People engaged in these actions are voluntarily doing so, even though they are making immoral action by the people they engage with lucrative.

So here is an important moral question: Is a crime found in the accusation of criminality, or in the comission of the criminality? Some examples to illustrate: A man steals a phone. If he is caught, but the person who was stolen from forgives the criminal and gives him the phone out of free choice, was the theft a crime? In this case the lack of accusation causes there to be no crime comitted. However, is the man still a criminal? even though his actions were forgiven, is he a criminal simply by comitting the crime?