Hi thinkers and alike,
What are the MORAL pros and cons when it comes to 'clickbait'?
If some proportions are to be provably moral, what are good approximations/guidelines that could be put forward?
Are there any important long term consequences?
(due to the argument of the thread, was the title chosen as such, all for the intended constructive purpose of pure demonstration itself)
- - - -
I have done a search on the forum but haven't found any thread with this topic.
- - - -
Here's a Wikipedia definition
Here's a(n) Urban dictionary definition
Here's what Merriam-Webster 'says'
- - - -
my stance:
I have no problem with it, unless I forgot to put on my 'thinking cap'. Though definitely have been always drawn to content where the claim (even if hyperbolic) have been greatly justified throughout the content and falls after overall consideration into the 'soft-clickbait' category.
- - - -
other, similar terms:
'link bait'
'sensational titles'
'SEO-d titles'
(churnalism?)
...
- - - -
Have a good one,
Barnsley