Search the Community

I wanted to share with you a discussion I had with Larken Rose. Actually, I wanted to share another discussion I had with a libertarian friend, on the same topic. The short version is: Larken: I rather die than kill innocent people Me: If you take a human-shield, YOU are responsible for his death, not I ...and it goes to: "Eyal, one fine test of how stupid someone's philosophy is, is to ask, if the whole world shared that philosophy, what would things be like? Well, if the whole world believed as YOU do, as soon as ONE act of aggression occurs, there will be perpetual mass murder, as the victim slaughters innocents in the name of "self defense," and then some of HIS victims do the same, and so on, forever." "Larken, what you're doing here is a Red Herring, as the issue is not the universality, but whether we recognize Israel's bombing of Gaza as self-defense or not." If you find the topic interesting, I invite you to read from the attached screenshot(s) (I'll upload the other discussions/debates later) Screenshot: (debate with Larken) https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D7790656_95600811_928427 Screenshot 2: (debate with a friend and his friends) https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D7790656_95600811_929516 Screenshot 3: (debate with random anarchists on Jeff Berwick's wall) https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D7790656_95600811_937136 Screenshot 4: (debate with the same guy from screenshot#2, again) https://www.sugarsync.com/pf/D7790656_95600811_938601 I also recommend watching this video by Pat Condell, which I posted in those debates: And this short video too And just for laughs: The entire situation in less than 1 minute video http://tinypic.com/r/2mmir9s/8