Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'illegal immigration'.
Found 2 results
-
When I read Tragedy & Hope, I was absolutely blown away by the brilliant and cutting mind of Carroll Quigley. One of the passages that always stuck out to me, was near the end of the book when Quigley goes over Latin America in some detail. The thought had never occurred to me before, and I have never heard anyone discuss it or mention it after, that Latin American culture could have a large Islamic influence. Quigley refers to this as The Pakistani-Peruvian Axis. With the state of current events in Western Civilization involving massive immigration from 3rd world cultures (Mexico/Latin America in the US, Syria/Middle East in Europe), I felt that it is worth it to share this idea of Quigley's in a more digestible format. The passage from the book is only 8 pages long, so I'm able to present the idea in audio format without asking a person to spend months grinding through a 1300-page tome. I appreciate comments, thoughts, and analyses! -
To preface, I am taking a complete Devil's Advocate position. Although no liberal in my encounters has made this argument and not sure if they would even connect this dot, it came to my mind and wanted to be well prepared in advanced in case this argument comes up and figure out how to rebut it with strong, consistent arguments. I imagine one day a liberal to come and argue....hey... you want to lift bans on guns, which can be used dangerously, so why not lift bans on immigration since only some immigrants are dangerous. Is there a equivilency to argue here? How would one counter?
