Search the Community

With the ascension of Donald Trump, there also arose a new right-wing movement. This movement was the equal and opposite reaction not just to the culture of hysterical verbal abuse from the left that has descended like a storm from hell upon any attempts at rational discourse, but also to the left’s treacherous enablers within the mainstream conservative movement that would rather virtue signal their ideological purity than actually conserve our freedoms. This group, which championed Western civilization and sought to preserve its most precious treasures from the rapid advancement of corrosive leftist ideals, quickly became an alternative to the spineless Republican establishment’s brand of in-name-only “conservatism” that has been exemplified by the likes of globalist cronies such as the Bushes and Paul Ryan. Realizing the real threat this movement posed to their chances of winning the 2016 election once Donald Trump secured the Republican nomination, the Clinton Campaign quickly came up with a new strategy to besmirch their opponents. This strategy was to cojoin the Trump movement with a separate group called the Alt-right due the the Alt-right’s inclination towards exploring controversial topics. Ever since, there has been a misconception that the Alt-right is the new-right movement that’s emerged as an alternative to the Republican/cuckservative establishment. These are the Milos, Paul Joseph Watsons, Gavin Mclnnes’, and the Lauren Southerns of the alternative media. These people champion nationalism over globalism and promote western values like free speech, while understanding the threat that massive third world immigration, particularly from Islamic countries, poses to the existence of these values. And while there are many areas of overlap between the New-Right and Alt-right, there are a few crucial distinctions. The purpose of this piece is to highlight these key distinctions and share material for those who are interested in taking a journey through taboo. Race First and foremost is the issue of race. The Alt-right recognizes that race is a reality and a very important one. The Alt-right at its core is about promoting racial consciousness among Europeans. They are unabashedly pro-white (not to be confused with white-supremacism, which advocates for domination over groups deemed inferior.) Whatever issues those within the Alt-right disagree about, this is the issue that unites them. The New-right, while they are quick to point out anti-white racism and see the reality of racial differences, do not advocate for white’s issues. They see western civilization as the result of certain values. On the other hand, the Alt-right would explicitly say that there are differences between the races and thus, different races build different civilizations. Furthermore, there’s no reason to think non-whites can maintain civilizations built by whites. This is an unavoidable issue for the Alt-right. The Jewish Question Given how explosive this topic is, it’s no wonder why the Hillary campaign wanted to associate the Trump movement with a group that flirts with such a taboo even though there isn’t unanimous agreement among those within the Alt-right about the importance of this subject. Western society has gone through a rapid decline throughout the past hundred years. Any analysis that seeks to understand why we are in the mess we’re in has to take a number of variables into consideration. The Alt-right, as a group that is concerned about the advancement of white’s interests and the protection of their heritage, is very concerned with figuring out white’s missteps which have contributed to this decline. At the same time, the Alt-right rejects historical narratives devoid of any nuance which are designed to provoke white guilt. So, just as it is important to understand the role Europeans have played in the societal decline we are witnessing today, it is equally important to understand the role Jews have played. Thus, the Jewish question is not a single question, but rather an umbrella term which covers a wide-ranging debate about the positive and negative aspects which Jewish influence has had on the Western world. WW2 Revisionism World War 2 was one of the most horrific events ever to occur in human history. It’s estimated that over 60 million people, mostly European, died as a result of this catastrophe. Because of the profound and permanent impact this war has had, it is critical to understand what really happened and why. What makes the Alt-right different from the Alt-light in this respect is what exactly they are willing to question. Like many significant historical events, WW2 is shrouded in propaganda. Details and nuances are left out of the versions of this event that most people are taught about in government schools throughout the world. It is in fact illegal in many countries to question certain details of the official narratives of the Second World War. Truth does not fear investigation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5zr0LcAtbA Post Script: The videos shared here do not necessarily represent my views as this material is new to me and so I'm still in the studying phase. So, I'm not interested in having long debates on the message board with people who might disagree with something in the content videos shared.

Stefan shares visions typical of Zionist patriotic propaganda as he brings up genetics to dissipate the disproportionate influence and power the Jewish and/or Zionist lobbies exert on the Western world. REALLY?! My response: The super-achieving Nobel winning Jews Stefan refers to are NOT even close to being a distinct racial group. They come from all corners of Europe (usually where socioeconomic conditions favour higher education and research) http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/131008/ncomms3543/full/ncomms3543.html. Ethiopian Jews are not discovering and inventing much. Sephardic Jews still living in third world countries are not inventing much. The same goes for Semitic Jews in Arabia and Iran who are not in the process of discovering the next subatomic particle either. The reason there are a lot of Jews in a variety of sectors in the West is because as an religiously inspired and endogamic tribalist community they may or tend to favour their own (usually according to political inclination). An example is Murdoch and his warmongering media networks; Hollywood and its propaganda, Western governments and parliaments and their proportion of MPs who visited Israel (more than 10% of French MPs have Israeli passports), etc. These are areas that do not even require an exceptional IQ but because they are key to maintain power and carry out more colonialism they will not be handed out to the anti-war Jew or the anti-war black guy (by the way, anti-war Jews are rarely spoken of and tend to get beaten up by terror groups like the Jewish Defense League who benefit from complete impunity in countries like France). The rest of Jewry who are not doing so well have suffered a long history of racism from European Jews. Just look up Israeli crimes committed on Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews after WWII (the Israeli government actually had to apologise officially to Sephardi Jews) and the racism Ethiopian Jews have to endure to have a chance in the apartheid colonialist state of Israel. @ Stefan: add these other less mediatised less privileged Jewish people to the equation and then more context to your vision, and you will see that the genetic racialist explanation has no basis. Also, the Zionist "conspiracy" is an agenda that can be verified by the geopolitical developments on the ground (see the expantionist evolution of Israel on the map), the recurring Israeli wars of aggression on its neighbouring countries, the number of politicians who declare their unfailing support for Israel in order to further their political career, disproportionate financial and military aid shipped from Western countries under Zionist influence, the same countries' veto history, etc. Furthermore, it is no secret that this "conspiacy" has been declared by Zionist high-profile personalities many times in the media and in political literature. One example of this is sephardi jew Jacques Attali, known for his reputation as a visionary, and as an advisor to French presidents Sarkozy, Hollande and Mittérand, also an omnipresent figure on TV and philosophical forums, who says: It will be the people's choice whether the new world order will be established either after another world war or without another world war [through the submission of the people]. The new world order will have a central capital, and it is my dream that it would be the city of Jerusalem in Israel. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wr_yHoUTMEo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBiGyA9iDWE Maybe, it's time to snap out of denial... One would expect Stefan to see Zionist/Jewish lobbies as the prime example of the inherently corruptible government system and the limitless extent that can go, instead of using empty language such as "conspiracy theory" or bringing up a racialist explanation.