Search the Community

We have seen the result of mass migration of low IQ demographic in Europe and the chaos that followed. But it seems that Canada doesn't learn from the mistakes of others or from its passed mistakes. In 2010, Quebec received a massif migration from Haiti. Harper didn't like Quebeckers and he tried to replace the demographic. These low IQ, no skills, migrants did not integrate well in our society. Very soon, some neighbourhoods lived in fear from hostile black gangs. They used intimidation on the population, sold drugs, brutalised people, forced women in prostitution and commited murders. This was in the northern part of Montreal, a place where honest labourers with little money lived. People that didn't have the money to move. At the end of his term, Harper decided to prosecute and deport some migrants, but the damage to our society was done. Now Trudeau is calling for all of the illegal migrants in the USA to come to Canada. And what do you know, the people from Haiti are coming to Montreal where the Maire Codere said it was a sanctuary city. They stuffed all these people in the stadium, which is a 5 minutes walk from where I live. We know very well that criminality will explode in the neighbourhood very soon. Seriously, I'm starting to fucking lose it. Everyone in this province has had a piece of their brain removed at birth or something. Everyone in this province is a lefty. Everyone is a fucking socialist. No one sees the shit storm around the corner. They see the shit going on in Europe and they put their blindfold on. They reject reality and substitute their own. I regularly hear people say that it is not so bad if new laws are imposed on us that restrict speech. They dont care, they just dont care. I swear, when I'm finished with university, I'm moving south of the border, I'm purchasing the biggest riffle I can find and I'm dip my bullets in pork fat. There is an epic shit storm that is going to fall on Canada and these r type morons wont know what hit them.

I've written a rather long, 62 page paper (.pdf) on Individualism vs. Collectivism. I wrote this for a newsletter I have been providing for friends and family since 2013 (I was motivated initially by the Snowden Revelations). I've noticed recently however that most of my friends are leftists/progressives/Marxists and basically either say nothing in response or even get offended and I get a lot of snarky comments even from family although I have a few supporters too. I'd like to have my work read, reviewed and commented/edited by someone a little more "Anarcho-Friendly". The writing is designed somewhat for a more liberal audience (i.e. my friends and family) so there are some things I can't go into and I try to keep it up to date with current events (a few of Molyneux's videos are linked). I do my best not to rant on the left but there's a lot of stuff that clearly bothers me about them in my writing. Lots of stuff about race/gender/identity in the Anarchist vs. Collectivist view, economics and centralized planning, a huge section on mass human migration and capping off with R vs. K topics and even a little section on the connections between Buddhism and Anarchy. I am happy to email or share with others for free. I have more documents from the past too and I am interested in having someone, who has a moderate amount of web traffic, potentially host my writing (anonymously) if they are OK with it (of course withing some reasonable editorial flexibility). Shoot me a line if this interests you - the file is too big to upload... Thanks! V.A.

Imagine states as big, big corporations, and they simply offer services in exchange for money. Except that they happen to have the internal policy that if you are on their own territory (private property), they make the taxes mandatory. However, it is more efficient to pool resources if you have many clients. Also, the clients express their CONSENT by STAYING IN THAT country. But there still is competition between states. You are free to move to the state which offers you the best service for the least money. The states which listen to what people need and inform them what they're getting into are the ones which more people will consider worth migrating to. And if you really think about the "mandatory tax" part, perhaps it's better that way, because it's much, much more expensive to live on your own on a deserted island. So the tax is just the profit of the state. EDIT: also solving the free rider problem. Even in Somalia, while it was anarho-capitalist-ish, you HAD to belong to a clan in order to have any rights, even though you were free to migrate between them. States work best when small and adaptable to what their people want. And it's better to have many small states so people more easily migrate. So, do your job by telling people who don't like it to either migrate, or to fight for lower taxes or division.I am no longer an anarcho-capitalist, but a minarchist. Can you convince me otherwise?