So I was reading this "Mental Lever" (https://www.zeroaggressionproject.org/mental-lever/social-science-part-1/) at the Zero Aggression Project. Near the end it says:
The article links to a Wikipedia article on scientism (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism).
The way the article was written makes it seem like a concept dreamed up by superstitious people to misrepresent and explain away science.
For example, in the first sentence they put "authoritative" in quotes. Then they conclude that science "excludes other viewpoints".
Anyway, I was just curious if anyone here had heard of "the intellectual error of Scientism" and had more to add than the seemingly biased Wikipedia article. If Scientism were valid, it might pose problems to the arguments supporting Universally Preferable Behavior.