Alan C. Posted January 11, 2013 Posted January 11, 2013 Michael Savage: Time for a 'Nationalist' party “We need a nationalist party in the United States of America,” said Savage on WABC’s “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” suggesting a party focused on “borders, language and culture.” . . . “Borders, language, culture has been my motto in radio from the beginning,” Savage explained. “Nationalism is the only thing that can save America, and a new nationalist party that has a very strict firewall that does not permit the radical fringe of racism.” He continued, “Going forward we have to, I think on radio, continue to educate the audiences about nationalism and the importance of our nation and our nation’s sovereignty – borders, language, culture. Borders, language, culture – it defines every nation on the planet, the flag, the language, the borders. And what is it the internationalists do? They want to dissolve the borders, they want to introduce multiculturalism, they want to introduce a Tower of Babel of languages.”
IGotYou Posted January 12, 2013 Posted January 12, 2013 Isn't this what the Republican party already is?
Beros Posted January 19, 2013 Posted January 19, 2013 This attitude is just baffling to me. How is the introduction of other languages such a pressing problem (if a problem at all) that you have to make it one of the legs of your political party?
Carlos Morales Posted January 22, 2013 Posted January 22, 2013 This attitude is just baffling to me. How is the introduction of other languages such a pressing problem (if a problem at all) that you have to make it one of the legs of your political party? Because language is one of the most important parts of a culture. Much of the way we think, not necessarily scientifically but on a subjective preference level, is based on our language. I'm obviously not agreeing with Savage, he's a bit of a dip shit.
Recommended Posts