Rob_Ilir Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 Helloall, first a quick intro. (very short to start a new thread)I am in my late 20's, lived in 3 continents equally, and I thought I was amethodist for most of my life, until methodist turned out to be nap rtr and upbwhen I learned about Stef.I was mostly raised in voluntary communities, I was emotionally neglected atthe beginning of my life for reasons that both my parents had no choice over,conscription in a commie country that is. I was from 6, and am still an entrepreneur,my highest peak was in the late 90's, but I have been working on the next bestanarchist gadget in my lab. With that said, here is my thoughts, and question.Since there are 7 billion people, living each day 24 hours a day, between themliving millions of years worth of experience. And let us assume that on average25% of it is statists schemes of loss, that I consider will be the future"free riders" anyway.Millions of years of labour a day will be available to the future Anarchist.I am looking at it with a very positive eye. But could there be problems with too manymillions of years of labour form, a day?
VforVoluntary49 Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 But could there be problems with too manymillions of years of labour form, a day? Could you maybe expound upon what you think potential problems might be-I don't quite understand what the question is.
N01Z10N Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 I see no problems. If you're trying to get at something like the machines taking our jobs and we're left unemployed, I think it actually just opens more possibilities to arts, luxuries, etc.. But I'm not quite sure what the question is either
VforVoluntary49 Posted February 11, 2013 Posted February 11, 2013 Exactly-the only problem I see is the pain of looking at the millions and millions of labor-hours and other wasted resources of the last century alone that were spent on wars, government programs, war on drugs, war on terror, war on illiteracy, artifically restricted by unions etc. that could have been spent much more productively in the the free market to advance our civilization lightyears ahead. We should probably have jet-packs that run on a glass of water a day by now, if we weren't so busy spending trillions of dollars and people's lives fighting to defend or invade imaginary lines on maps.
Rob_Ilir Posted February 11, 2013 Author Posted February 11, 2013 Maybe it is mybackground, but too much idleness usually rots things in nature/mechanics, andhaving such an extra labour might cause some degradation in itself, once thereis no weird bottom priced incentives like the today's state.Or in other terms, lack of subsidies might createreal problems that maybe today we can't see.
Rob_Ilir Posted February 11, 2013 Author Posted February 11, 2013 I can't seeanything wrong either, just checking if my optimism is really out of touch. Thank you.
Recommended Posts