Nielsio2 Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 "Any notion of ‘justice’ that is not derived from personal human ends is precisely what is wrong with the world." http://www.vforvoluntary.com/articles/a-critique-of-murray-rothbards-why-be-libertarian.html
prohexa Posted June 19, 2013 Posted June 19, 2013 Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm totally with Rothbard there. As far as I can tell he is only talking about "the argument from efficiency" vs. "the argument from morality". Stef has made the same point numerous times... http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/molyneux6.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/molyneux7.html
Nielsio2 Posted June 19, 2013 Author Posted June 19, 2013 Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm totally with Rothbard there. As far as I can tell he is only talking about "the argument from efficiency" vs. "the argument from morality". Stef has made the same point numerous times... http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/molyneux6.html http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/molyneux7.html A Critique of 'Forget The Argument From Efficiency' A critique of Stefan Molyneux’s “Consequentialist arguments don’t work” http://www.vforvoluntary.com/articles/a-critique-of-stefan-molyneuxs-consequentialist-arguments-dont-work.html A critique of Molyneuvian ethics ('universally preferable behavior') http://www.vforvoluntary.com/articles/a-critique-of-molyneuvian-ethics-universally-preferable-behavior.html
prohexa Posted June 20, 2013 Posted June 20, 2013 Are you trying to say that "the argument from efficiency" is more convincing than "the argument from morality" when promoting voluntaryism to statists?
Recommended Posts