Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm totally with Rothbard there. As far as I can tell he is only talking about "the argument from efficiency" vs. "the argument from morality". Stef has made the same point numerous times...

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/molyneux6.html

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/molyneux7.html

 

A Critique of 'Forget The Argument From Efficiency'

 

A critique of Stefan Molyneux’s “Consequentialist arguments don’t work”

http://www.vforvoluntary.com/articles/a-critique-of-stefan-molyneuxs-consequentialist-arguments-dont-work.html

 

A critique of Molyneuvian ethics ('universally preferable behavior')

http://www.vforvoluntary.com/articles/a-critique-of-molyneuvian-ethics-universally-preferable-behavior.html

Posted

Are you trying to say that "the argument from efficiency" is more convincing than "the argument from morality" when promoting voluntaryism to statists?

 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.