Stefan Molyneux on Rational Wiki . org

[LovePrevails]

perhaps a better home for Stefan than wikipedia, which keeps removing any reference to Stefan as a "philosopher"

you know how elitist those lefties are when it comes to applying "their" words

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Main_Page

 

 

anyone care to start off his page?

[Barry_diller]

I don't find rational wiki very rational., it's full of political bias, and is attacking all other people and ideas that dosn't fit in to their views. and so many bad jokes. I though a wiki was supposed to be neutral. the normal wiki is actually alot better   

[JamesP]

Any wiki is a product of majority rule... I would not presume neutrality on the part of the maintainers.

[Guest - Josh -]

RationalWiki is rational in name only. Its articles advocate Atheism+ and label anyone who disagrees as misogynists. Its articles on TheAmazingAtheist and anyone else who have criticized the notion of patriarchy show it to be quite a radically biased site.

 

RationalWiki makes Wikipedia look like the FDR forums. Wikipedia is the best option of the two. Creating an article at RationalWiki is liable to lead to a libelous entry down the road, so I strongly advise against it.

[Think Free]

Is there a Wikipedia-acceptable source that claims Stefan is a philosopher? Even one that describes him as a self-described philosopher? If not, I wouldn't bother with it. Wikipedia is what it is. It has its strengths and its limitations, but we shouldn't take its limitations too personally.