Tadas Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 I see that there are many unjustified haltered towards state. because of the laws of nature it is obvious that group of people is stronger stronger than single individual so 2 people who group together van easily enslave one free man. to protect his freedom that man is required to join n another group which has equal power to resist those who are trying to steal his property or take him into slavery. however it does not end here more violent groups with stronger motivation will easily defeat peaceful group which allows violent people to acquire exponentially more power all this ends with formation of state which is quite violent. people cant leave that state because they will be destroyed immediately so formation of state is inevitable. no how states can allow existence of anarchy: most recent form of state is republic. republic is when everyone has equal rights and responsibilities written in constitution. in result there is no need for government unless constitution is flawed and laws must be constantly adjusted if constitution is perfect government is just out of place because laws do not need to be changed ever. now important part is how to maintain that state, we can either be completely interchangeable and everyone of us perform as policeman doctor teacher as long as we have desire to do that work. we can chose to delegate our rights to some chosen people like if there are 100 people in neighborhood, we all delegate our right to some representative who now has do judgements in the name of everyone who gave him that right. you may disagree with his judgement but if you transferred him that right you lost it. other alternative would be not to delegate your rights but just hire someone to enforce constitution literally. that way we all can act like policemen and judge or even kill anyone we find necessary as long as we do not contradict constitution. if you murder someone by mistake you will be hunted as murderer yourself so all your judgement fall on your private responsibility. but in practice this version will not be chosen because if very high risk if constitution is ambiguous. you can easily misinterpret it and become criminal yourself. so we fall down to current version where citizens delegate their rights so some chosen people elected to protect their constitution while losing all these rights themselves but gaining rights that are described in constitution. act of voting is not for election, it is contract when you delegate your rights of choice to these whom you mark on that paper. So if you voted you have no right to complain about their decision because you signed contract of delegating your rights of state management to these people. Anonymous voting removes all responsibility from your choices what is core evil of state merely changing voting to named would instantly fix most of the problems because voter will be accountable for all their choices. national debt will be extorted from those who chose government which created it, every failure will have people who are responsible directly and must repay for all damage.
Recommended Posts