JimPhoenix Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 I would really love to see a debate between Stefan Molyneux against The Amazing Atheist. I think that Adam Kokesh wasn't good enough in this debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9hHvX1k6FRM Molyneux is the guy to end the confusion of socialists.. What can we do to make this happen?
Emanuel Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 I don't think it's a good idea. He's obviously not going to change his mind. I think Stef can make much better use of his time by introducing new subjects or new insights into important subjects.
Think Free Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 This was the debate where I started watching and only watched for like 15 minutes before giving up because it seemed like TheAmazingAtheist came to the "debate" with no actual position and just some vague grumpy feelings.
JimPhoenix Posted November 5, 2013 Author Posted November 5, 2013 It's the confusion of the socialists. They can't understand a life without coercion. I think because they are lazy... I can tell a socialist by their lazyness
kalmia Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 I haven't listened to this guy, but It might be worth it if he could attract new people from it. I would like to see a debate over the state with Seth Andrews. I have doubts he would go for it though.
Josh F Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 wow i wasted 14 minutes thinking this atheist asshole was going to be cool, and then BOOM fuck you fuck this fuck that. i hate angry atheists
Think Free Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 wow i wasted 14 minutes thinking this atheist asshole was going to be cool, and then BOOM fuck you fuck this fuck that. i hate angry atheists Yeah, "fuck you" was his "argument" of choice.
Mike Fleming Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 wow i wasted 14 minutes thinking this atheist asshole was going to be cool, and then BOOM fuck you fuck this fuck that. i hate angry atheists Thanks for saving me time, I just fast forwarded straight to around 13 minutes or so and saw exactly what you mean. It was degenerating fast.
Culain Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 Please don't debate this AmazingAthiest guy, I see Storm Clouds Gathering happening all over again. He agrees with the 'Morality' but wants solid Practical proof, so it's all going to move into theoretical solve every single x issue.
Wuzzums Posted November 5, 2013 Posted November 5, 2013 I stopped bothering with TAA after he endorsed Howard Bloom, a guy that debated the 2nd law of thermodynamics without him bothering to google up a definition. So yeah, that's basically his standard of insight.
Recommended Posts