Discussion for Eastern Phlosophy on Psychlogy

[ashesmi]

I had a really strong background in Eastern Thinking growing up. So Yin and Yang was my philosophy, just can't describe the stuff.

Anyhow here is a New Psychology I am playing with, has anyone seen this before? I am sure there are lots of mistakes in it below, but does it make sense to anyone? The direction at least? This is Liquid Gummy Science. I am not trying to abort it with debate, but give birth to it with discussion.

Yang - Male - Alpha - Left Brain

Alpha Alpha's are Competitive by nature.
Alpha Alphas compete against other Alpha Alpha's for the Omegas.
All Alpha's Protect and Cooperate with Omega's.
Alpha Beta's are Weak Alpha's, and do what they are told by the Alpha Alpha and Stronger Alpha Beta's.
There can only be One Alpha Alpha at the top for Peace within the Alpha's Social Structor (A.S.S.)
Detachment, Ego and Fear (Compotion)

The 4 Male Alpha Types.

Alpha Alpha - Jessy Ventura
Alpha Omega - Howard Stern
Omega Alpha - Joe Rogan, Alex Jones
Omega Omega - David Icke


Yin - Female - Omega - Right Brain

Omega's coroperate with other Omegas. Omegas control the Alpha's they serve.
Omega Beta's are Weaker or Younger Omegas.
Omega Beta's Mature into Omega's and Cooropate with other Omega's.
There can be many Omega's together for Peace within the Omega Social Structor (O.S.S.)
Empathy, Oneness and Love (Corroperation)

The 4 Female Omega Types.

Omega Omega - Jane Addams
Omega Alpha - Cleopatra
Alpha Omega - Joan of Arc
Alpha Alpha - Margaret Thatcher

Omegas Serve while Alphas Protect, in Ballance they serve and protect each other Omega is Inside, Alpha is Outside. Alpha is the skin to protecting it's Heart Omega, Omega is the Heart for Alpha, without Omega Alpha suffers. Alpha protect's all Omega's.

As Omega's Receive they Share.
As Alphas Share they Receive.
The Omega Balances the Alpha. Alpha's go crazy till they have Omega's to bring their Power into focus. Without the Slave Controlling Master the Master is Powerless. Power is only as great as the Labour that controls it.

An Alpha Omega Omega is an Alpha who is More about Empathy, Oneness and Love. It is Not Competitive yet it welcomes suggestions not Orders from Alphas as it is Cooperation Based. They do not want to be followed as they are Omega and they do not want to be Lead as they are the Alpha, they want to Live and let Live, I am about Live and Let Live, guess which one I am


Females Omega Omega are the Softest of Omegas and are Maternal and Feminine, they desire Power.

Male Alpha Alpha's are the Strongest of Alphas and are Paternal and Masculine, they desire Labour.

This is yin yang based.

[Kevin Beal]

It generally makes sense to me that there would be complementary roles like you described in male and female psychology, but why is it important to you to square Taoism with psychology and the philosophy talked about in this show? Or put another way, why is taoism important to you?

 

None of this is any kind of proof, obviously, but I do have an opinion about what you're saying.

 

I am negatively biased against these sorts of typologies that may be more personal than logical, but people make astrology fit, make numerology fit, make all kinds of categories for who a person is. I personally don't understand the appeal of that. I think of myself (for example) as being made up of many different personalities. Which is probably why people identify with multiple horoscopes at different times or even the same time. People have sun signs and moon signs and planetary signs etc to make up for the limits of this sort of categorical approach.

 

I can say that I identify with being a horse. Some people actually literally say that. I like to describe myself sometimes thru use of analogy, but I wonder if really it is all that helpful to do that. Rather I think being specific is the way to go.

 

I'm a 26yr old male living in northern california who works as a web developer for an insurance company, who enjoys debating and learning about philosophy in his free time, rents a room in a house living a modest living, with aspirations to be a successful entrepreneur and fall in love.

 

Or you could say that I'm an INTP, a libra, a rabbit and my spirit animal is an owl (all given by different typologies).

 

Which of these do you think is more helpful in understanding who I am?

[PatrickC]

This reminds me of my own family mythology. You know, xelent's family were never destined for this that or the other. Only these vague appeals to the stars and tides apparently..

[ashesmi]

It generally makes sense to me that there would be complementary roles like you described in male and female psychology, but why is it important to you to square Taoism with psychology and the philosophy talked about in this show? Or put another way, why is taoism important to you?

 

None of this is any kind of proof, obviously, but I do have an opinion about what you're saying.

 

I am negatively biased against these sorts of typologies that may be more personal than logical, but people make astrology fit, make numerology fit, make all kinds of categories for who a person is. I personally don't understand the appeal of that. I think of myself (for example) as being made up of many different personalities. Which is probably why people identify with multiple horoscopes at different times or even the same time. People have sun signs and moon signs and planetary signs etc to make up for the limits of this sort of categorical approach.

 

I can say that I identify with being a horse. Some people actually literally say that. I like to describe myself sometimes thru use of analogy, but I wonder if really it is all that helpful to do that. Rather I think being specific is the way to go.

 

I'm a 26yr old male living in northern california who works as a web developer for an insurance company, who enjoys debating and learning about philosophy in his free time, rents a room in a house living a modest living, with aspirations to be a successful entrepreneur and fall in love.

 

Or you could say that I'm an INTP, a libra, a rabbit and my spirit animal is an owl (all given by different typologies).

 

Which of these do you think is more helpful in understanding who I am?

 

I wish I could tell you which one you were, but I don't fully understand where you would sit in a Room full of other Alpha's unless I saw you in the room with them.  Your body language may be able to tell me or where you would be in the chain of command in the room.   It would be like you trying to analyse me from a computer screen a thousand miles away with only a couple of brief lines.  Sorry wish I could tell you   but I can't.  I can only guess, I might as well flip a coin and tell you.  If this goes against the philosophy in the forum could I ask for a section with gummy lsd on it perhaps, because this isn't something solid like Solid Science Development.

 

This is a Solid Science Development forum and I respect that, I as a Omega Omega (Using this Description)  don't want to step on any toes or ruffle anyone's feathers.  Perhaps a LSD Section in the forum perhaps?  I would hang out there and not bug anyone

 

My Yin Yang thinking is a Long story...to long to tell, but it is a philosophy of psychology I understand and use only as a description not an explanation.   It can't be Repeated, it is in the Eyes of SSD Hocus Pocus Mumbo Jumbo.  To some in gummy SD this is cool.  To others is LSD it is COSMIC

 

 

[Kevin Beal]

I meant between me telling you I'm an libra, and me telling you I'm 26 and into philosophy, etc. Which one tells you more about me? The point I was trying to make is that categories can be very unhelpful in understanding someone.

 

And I don't know what "gummy LSD" means. Google doesn't yield any answers on that.

 

This forum allows for almost any topic, as long as it doesn't violate the community guidelines (which are pretty lax). It's just that if you are presenting ideas, you should expect them to be held to a high standard of reason and evidence.

 

What psychological insights do you see being gleaned from applying these categories?

[Wesley]

I meant between me telling you I'm an libra, and me telling you I'm 26 and into philosophy, etc. Which one tells you more about me? The point I was trying to make is that categories can be very unhelpful in understanding someone.

 

And I don't know what "gummy LSD" means. Google doesn't yield any answers on that.

 

This forum allows for almost any topic, as long as it doesn't violate the community guidelines (which are pretty lax). It's just that if you are presenting ideas, you should expect them to be held to a high standard of reason and evidence.

 

What psychological insights do you see being gleaned from applying these categories?

http://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/38120-gummy-lsd-science-area-on-freedomain-radio/