LovePrevails Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 I was wondering if anyone could think of ways of making use of the principles here for making our efforts to turn people to peaceful parenting or anarchocapitalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cab21 Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 i'll start off with notes myth one education will change behavior telling 20% how you present information 1make information tangible 2personalize information 3interact with other people 60% loss adverse appeal to audiance give information audience cares about myth two you don't have to change attitudes to change behavioar attitudes follow behavior set behavior expectations connect to values conserve resources understand values myth three people think they know what motivates them social norms saw someone else do it experiment results rather than what people say social norms and modeling show social norms in correct way now to create some sentences, with some figures pulled out of nowhere, the the principle is the point 90% of prisoners came from abusive homes, do you want your child to be in prison? 90% of millionaires came from families that practiced peaceful parenting and pro capitalism values, do you want your child to become a millionaire? behavior of happy and successful adults includes X 90% of the time behavior of unhappy and unsuccessful adults includes Y 90% of the time create a movie/ picture of a mother spanking her child in prison create a movie picture of a mother and child doing different peaceful parenting activities and being happy, maybe a family sitting at a dinner table telling stories, or a child reading a bedtime story with her mother and father. Got stefan molyneux beliefs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dsayers Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 I guess I'm proof positive about the knowing your audience point she made. I became much more resistant once the focus turned almost exclusively to "climate change" and using the word "green" to mean something other than the color. Partially because almost nobody talking about conservation, climate change, pollution, etc EVER brings up that coercion is the biggest polluter of all. I disagree with when she said that when building green buildings, saving money is secondary. Everything we do is motivated by profit. Even if that means building a building that might cost more, but will be more appealing and therefore generate more revenue. This is one of the fatal flaws in things like the Americans with Disabilities Act and smoking bans. If it's good for business, people will do it without the gun to their head. If it's not what people want, putting guns to people's heads won't be helpful. Oh and she went on to say eliminate waste when waste can only in fact be reduced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LovePrevails Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 yes it was a poor (but populist) example, just speaking regarding the principles of persuasion she discusses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cab21 Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 make peaceful parenting more profitable make anarchism more profitable social norms of a successful and profitable anarchist peaceful parenting family Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Carolus Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 90% of prisoners came from abusive homes, do you want your child to be in prison?90% of millionaires came from families that practiced peaceful parenting and pro capitalism values, do you want your child to become a millionaire? 90% of prisoners coming from abusive homes, is not the same as: 90% of all of the abusive homes produce a prisoner (not that i agree with any form of abuse) 90% of millionaires came from families that practiced peaceful parenting and pro capitalism values, is not the same as: 90% of all people raised in families practicing peaceful parenting and pro capitalism values, become millionaires. Lovely stats btw and they are indeed correct, but i do believe that what i just stated is more true than what you stated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cab21 Posted February 28, 2014 Share Posted February 28, 2014 90% of prisoners coming from abusive homes, is not the same as: 90% of all of the abusive homes produce a prisoner (not that i agree with any form of abuse) stats about abusive homes, and stats about people that end up in bad places, can work together. there is power in both i think. 90% of millionaires came from families that practiced peaceful parenting and pro capitalism values, is not the same as: 90% of all people raised in families practicing peaceful parenting and pro capitalism values, become millionaires. stats about both means and ends make for a good combination i think, and your example points that out. what you stated can be used in combination with what i stated, and i think that creates a more powerful ad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts