Guest e Yer Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Can the firm or organization you work for be sociopathic? Yes it can. We tend to think of a job and a workplace as a place to: earn a living, provide job security, provide for healthcare and retirement, and because it allows us to have our "dream job." But companies like people are make up of people who collectively create a "culture." Some companies have a few people who are dedicated, well-suited to the work, and help to others and the company. On the other extreme, there are companies with workers who feel seniority, or length of time at the company, should, in all "fairness", provide privileges and a double standard for them. Many of these very badly run organizations or sociopathic workplaces are overseen by managers or owners who are egotistical, and sadistic. I'm a minority, and have worked in white run and staffed organizations in the mainland U.S. and believe me, they are dead end hell holes. I say this for the minorities out there who are nodding their heads in approval. So if you are one of those individuals working in a sociopathic organization and are taking that slow moving escalator to the moon with the only the hope of false promises at the end of the rainbow, then get off now! Choosing your company wisely is just as important as choosing your friends wisely. How you spend your time, whether at work or play, is devoting a part of your life to a cause and purpose. Life's too short to invest time that you will never get back in an abusive relationship, whether it be at work, at home, or at play.
dsayers Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 A sociopath is "a person whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal, and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience." Companies are not people, conscious, capable of behavior, or moral actors. To call a company sociopathic is to not hold accountable individuals who are capable of those things. Similarly, the word "minority" is dishonest and manipulative. It cannot be an accurate description of race because any singular race is a minority compared to the sum of all races combined. Furthermore, sociopathy exists independent of race. To bring race into something that has nothing to do with race, especially by way of terms such as "minority" is to obfuscate or frame the topic at hand. People leave jobs for various reasons every day, including decisions being made by higher ups. What did this post seek to accomplish?
Guest e Yer Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Dear Dsayer: The reason problems persists in the United States is because white people aren't willing to face up to the real evil in the world that is them. For example, U.S. soldiers are murderers, and a lot white companies in the U.S. are racist and sadistic. Dsayer, visit other parts of the non-white world and see how people react or don't react to you when you tell them you are a U.S. citizen.
Guest e Yer Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 A subject off the main topic. The Blockbuster Video store in my neighborhood recently close because of the Dish Network purchase and subsequent closure of stores. I used to rent a lot of videos for dramatic, philosophical, and cinematic reasons. Since it closed, I refuse to rent from Netflix and Redbox. I've essentially fasted from "Hollywood." Instead, I indulge in FDR, the History Channel, and various conspiracy and documentaries podcasts on YouTube. As result, I've come to the realization that U.S. made movies are all about white people and their dramas. Doesn't the U.S. audience want to see how non-whites have relationships and solve social and domestic problems? Are the only ones with Hollywood class acting ability white? I've seen Blacks and Asians play the dumbo in commercials. If it's a good laugh with the white audience, but I feel sorry for them. We have a Black president, Obama, who is intellectual and keeping us out of wars. China, Japan, India, and Korea economically are kicking the U.S.'s behind. That's the real world. Stefan has spoken a lot about how people live in their matrix and don't want to deal with the real world. The all white casted movies that continue to come from Hollywood is a testament to that mindset among whites. White people are narcissist. They want to see themselves on the silver screen. Today, we live in a rapidly changing world where the power balance is shifting from the consumers to the producers of the world. Financial Headlines today: Warren Buffet manages record profits for Berkshire Hathaway. That will fill the America people's sails with pride. But what does Warren Buffet produce? He only moves around numbers in U.S. fiat currency. I hear callers to Stefan all the time depressed about not being happy with their jobs or relationships. I assume most are white. Maybe it is because they are not that gifted in their line of work and have false narcissist relationships with one another. This is all made possible by a country that strokes them and leads them on.
dsayers Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Slow down, please. I only get so many downvotes per day. The reason problems persists in the United States is because white people aren't willing to face up to the real evil in the world that is them. This sentence makes these claims: 1) All white people are evil. 2) No evil comes from people who are not white. 3) These only apply to the United States. You say you indulge in FDR yet don't grasp that the moment you say something is only true in the US, it's absolutely untrue! Not just because the US doesn't exist, but because people are not fundamentally different in such a way that all of one side of the fundamental divide exist within a very specific, very large portion of the globe while everybody outside that same made up line fall on the other side of the fundamental divide. The same could be true about the first two claims. When a white and a non-white get pregnant, the baby is mixed. Is the baby evil or not? U.S. soldiers are murderers Soldiers carrying other flags do not also murder? All soldiers carrying the US flag have murdered or been party to murder? Wait, I thought the mark of evil was skin pigmentation. Are you also saying that everybody in the US is white and everybody outside the US are not white? a lot white companies in the U.S. are racist and sadistic I've already made the case that this is an anthropomorphism. If you find fault in my claim, address it. Repeating yourself as if it wasn't made proves that you are not interested in the truth, but rather are interested in wedging your theory into reality despite people not being able to will reality. As does the title being phrased as a question with the first dissenting input being met with the title being repeated as a claim rather than an exploration. Murder is immoral, can we agree on that much? Can you link skin pigmentation to capability of murder please? How much melanin (a characteristic of the skin) is needed to be able to prohibit the ability to will (a characteristic of the brain) the taking of another human life? Since lethal self-defense is mechanically identical to murder, are you also claiming that non-whites are not capable of resisting murderous encroachments? And if you actually believe your claims, why on earth would you broadcast this susceptibility to murderous, evil whitey?
Brock H Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Slow down, please. I only get so many downvotes per day. I laughed out loud on this one because I went to down vote his comment and got "You have reached your quota of negative votes for the day"
Guest e Yer Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Dear Brock H The truth really hurts. This is one way white people retaliate through procedural bullshit. Dream on. This voting system of FDR is a form of censorship. The free market of opinion would have it that if you don't agree, like, or if my views are upsetting to you, then don't view my comments when you see by e yer. I'm putting FDR to the test. I can have it or leave it. Frankly, I'm getting tire of hearing the same of repeated relationship problems from white people on the podcast. I assume that the FDR audience is prepared to hear other viewpoints out of the mainstream that don't sit well with them because they have been brainwashed, and propagandized by the state. To Brock H.: I can see the evil part of your brain light up with each negative vote casted against me. You, my friend, have supported my argument about evilness in white people. I rest my case.
JamesP Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 My friend, I do not doubt that there are companies owned and operated by sociopaths, nor do I doubt that some companies are run by sociopathic racists. But it is racist for you to declare that all whites are racist, especially without providing some kind of evidence. It is also not in keeping with the board rules to accuse others of bad intentions without any evidence. I have noticed that this is a pretty clear trend in your posting, and this is just not healthy for you. Either what you say is true, and you are spending your time with racists who hate you instead of doing something awesome with your life, or what you say is untrue and you are making unjust accusations instead of doing something awesome with your life.
dsayers Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 This voting system of FDR is a form of censorship. The free market of opinion would have it that if you don't agree, like, or if my views are upsetting to you, then don't view my comments when you see by e yer. The thing is, reality isn't up to us. I don't doubt that your experience is very real to you. However, it would appear by your method of communicating it that you have not subjected it to rigorous interpretation. Frankly, you make some very basic thinking errors and when pointed out to you, you pretend as if nothing was said. This isn't just prejudice, it's bigotry. You believe what you believe because you want to believe it. Of course this is going to clash with a place that is about philosophy. Look at your claim of censorship. I won't deny you that the voting system has the capacity for abuse. However, even if every member downvoted your every post, you'd still be able to post. Even if you were banned from this privately owned forum, you would be able to speak. I can't speak for others, but I almost exclusively save downvotes for blatant displays of putting the fallibility of the evidence of the senses ahead of the real world. It's just not philosophical.
Brock H Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Dear Brock H The truth really hurts. This is one way white people retaliate through procedural bullshit. Dream on. This voting system of FDR is a form of censorship. The free market of opinion would have it that if you don't agree, like, or if my views are upsetting to you, then don't view my comments when you see by e yer. I'm putting FDR to the test. I can have it or leave it. Frankly, I'm getting tire of hearing the same of repeated relationship problems from white people on the podcast. I assume that the FDR audience is prepared to hear other viewpoints out of the mainstream that don't sit well with them because they have been brainwashed, and propagandized by the state. To Brock H.: I can see the evil part of your brain light up with each negative vote casted against me. You, my friend, have supported my argument about evilness in white people. I rest my case. Well played.
Recommended Posts