Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been reading a few articles on the Rational Wiki website & oh my goodness I have never read something so bias & irrational since conservapedia.

I don't understand who could get their information from this website it is pure stupidity.

Posted

I see adjectives. I don't see any links, proof, or examples.

Well if it isn't my good friend...Here read these articles & pay close attention to the words & tone.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank_magnetismhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Austrian_schoolhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/CapitalismWhen you read the ones below they generally take on a forgiving & nicer tone than the ones above.http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Communismhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Socialismhttp://rationalwiki.org/wiki/ProgressiveUniform throughout the articles are unnecessary bashing of Libertarians, conservatives & Christians even when they aren't related to the topic. It almost comes off in the same way as Marx's whiney baby attitude in the Communist Manifesto.
Posted

At "Rational" Wiki, the article on Austrian Economics (AE) says, "...it is generally considered to be...outright pseudoscience."

 

As evidence of its "general consideration," they link to a FAQ on "liberalism" in which the author refers to AE as "crank science," then goes on to say that "the Austrian School of Economics is a tiny group of libertarians...financed by wealthy business donors on the far right."

Posted

At "Rational" Wiki, the article on Austrian Economics (AE) says, "...it is generally considered to be...outright pseudoscience."As evidence of its "general consideration," they link to a FAQ on "liberalism" in which the author refers to AE as "crank science," then goes on to say that "the Austrian School of Economics is a tiny group of libertarians...financed by wealthy business donors on the far right."

Yea it's insane, if they don't like Austrian Economics that's perfectly fine but don't lie about what it is or isn't, the contributors should take a neutral p.o.v. like Wikipedia does or they can present all the true information & then in a section within the article write why it isn't rational. If you can't trust their articles on one subject you can't trust them on all.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.