Rich C Haus Posted April 26, 2014 Posted April 26, 2014 I just saw this video today on Stef's facebook wall.Two large dogs stopping insistent mom from hitting child. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10152699514539692
Losilluminati Posted April 26, 2014 Posted April 26, 2014 *mock hitting. It was obvious the mom wasnt being serious or actually trying to strike the child,she was trying to get that reaction from the protective dogs. (although mock hitting your child for fun is proooobaly a bad sign)
dsayers Posted April 27, 2014 Posted April 27, 2014 (although mock hitting your child for fun is proooobaly a bad sign) True. If mock rape wouldn't fly, mock assault should be right out. In fact, you could argue that they're desensitizing the dogs.
corpus mentium Posted April 27, 2014 Posted April 27, 2014 Seems the dogs have the morality of the situation all worked out regarding whether or not the mother is doing right or wrong, no matter if she is actually going to hit the child or not. This situation between mother and child (and dogs) is just a variation on the pointy fingered hold-up in a convenience store where the faux gunman is held liable for any reactions by others that result in damages. It's unfortunate that the seeming majority of humanity can't or doesn't exhibit the same understanding as these dogs.
tiepolo Posted April 28, 2014 Posted April 28, 2014 This is another reason why I tend to prefer dogs to people...
Ritchey Posted May 9, 2014 Posted May 9, 2014 Seems as if Stef's bomb in the brain series has spread farther than anyone anticipated.
Recommended Posts