the psychology of hipsterism

[StylesGrant]

as from definition on urban dictionary

 

 

 

A contrived identity constructed out of a pastiche of symbols co-opted from bohemian movements of the past, and then reassembled and repackaged. Yet, unlike bohemian subcultures of earlier periods, the hipster lives by no common creed, ethic, or collection of political beliefs. Nor does the hipster offer a unique form of art, music, or literature as groups such as the Beats, Hippies, Yippies, or Punks once did. Rather, the hipster is driven by an effort to cultivate an identity as an end in itself, a persona that will presumably distinguish the hipster from their despised, and over-generalized concept of “mainstream culture.”

Hipster Psychology-

Hipster psychology is born out of experiences of rejection during childhood and adolescence as well as the resultant inability to conform to contemporary social standards. The hipster, as a psychological self defense mechanism, constructs an alternative perspective on culture and identity as a response to their subjective experience of social failure and emotional pain. Rather than accept their own shortcomings at face value, the hipster cultivates a self centered world view whereupon culture, religion, politics, and society as a whole are at fault for all that causes dissatisfaction and frustration. Furthermore, the hipster believes that his or her non-participation in “mainstream” life serves as a form of subversion itself, as well as proof positive of their intellectual enlightenment rather than an obvious demonstration of their failure to adapt. Because arrogance is the shadow of shame, the hipster converts his or her social incompetence into an attitude of superiority, and his or her failure into a disposition of pride.

Consequently, hipster culture presents an “alternative image” that attempts to counter, parody, mock, or even satire their concept of mainstream culture while providing a safe environment that, from afar, collectively gives the appearance of a movement. Thus, hipsters make it their practice to flaunt the photo-negative image of their idea of popular “suburban” culture. For example, if the average person in the suburbs shops in malls, the hipster will buy their clothing in second hand shops. If (over generalized) suburban men drive state of the art sports cars with large engines, the hipster may drive a modest Volkswagen or an old, very undersized subcompact European car such as an early seventies BMW, or better yet, ride a fixed gear bicycle with a sticker exclaiming “One Less Car.”

Because the Hipster loathes above all things to be seen as conventional they, as a rule, don’t work. According to existentialist orthodoxy, “one is what one does.” As a result, the hipster does nothing. The hipster’s lack of participation in any type of career, at least on the surface, functions as an attempt to avoid being characterized as "mainstream." However, upon deeper examination it isn't hard to discover that the hipster lacks the requisite skills to do anything purposeful anyway. Rather, for the hipster, one is as one "seems." And the hipster is very adept at being able to "seem." Seeming requires collecting symbols both material and intellectual and proves much easier on a frail body and psyche than actual work. This is particularly the case when parents help around rent time, if the hipster doesn't already own.

Because the hipster’s life is a lie that they tell to themselves (and don’t believe themselves) they demonstrate a high degree of instability and mental illness which will often be treated by psychoactive medication. Often hipsters will merely self-medicate, particularly if their parents don't pay their COBRA. As a result, hipsters will eventually exhibit behaviors that are truly alternative until they face the fact that their subculture is an elaborate buffer from their fear of non-acceptance and failure.

 

If indeed, the origin of hatred towards hipsters is a collective pejorative connotation to those who oppose all seeming flaws in the American society by those who feel a need to justify the status quo, who is at fault?

 

It seems cultural homogeneity and monoculture is a powerful tool of control. In fact, people like Chomsky constantly talk about Cultural hedgemony. Is Chomsky a hipster?

 

If hipsters are self evolving, self organizing, self created, divergently, without collective association, is it that they merely spring from the earth like flys..or are they a product of an actual cultural environment?

 

Why are some people so afraid of admitting that mainstream American culture and its institutions are heavily rooted in historical, childhood, and anti-principal anti-scientific immoral delusions?

 

If half of society is run by people who are afraid of being ostracized or seen as lacking in character and dignity and responsibility in a Capitalist society and refuse to criticize or allow criticism of the institutions that create the culture, and many are degenerate hipsters who offer no solution, change, or creation -but mere self expressed spiritual rebellion- then is there a future?

 

What kind of culture looks at self expressed rebellion and deems it useless? How is boycotting the consumption and participation in inherently immoral structures of the culture and economy not having an effect on the shape of a society in its economic directions?

 

Perhaps the apathy of society coupled with the tool Stockholm mentality is why the socialist national solution for those seeking protection from external and internal conflict sounds so cozy.

[Coinflip]

Sometimes I indulge in hipsterism simply to be contrarian. It's quite enjoyable.

[Jot]

Sometimes I indulge in hipsterism simply to be contrarian. It's quite enjoyable.

It doesn't surprise me because of your avatar.