College: a law stating "consent requires voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity." Gee, ya think?

[fractional slacker]

Is it possible to come up with a universal LEGAL definition of consent before sex? Outside of a 5 page notarized legal document, not sure how that could be. Even if the parties both sign, one party can claim they were intoxicated ex post facto and void the the contract, and legally move to prosecute the other party. 

The state has now managed to insert itself into any and all sexual activity between consenting adults IF they are enrolled in college. The supply side of victims is well and thriving. What could possibly go wrong? SMH

 

from article:"De Leon has said the legislation will begin a paradigm shift in how college campuses in California prevent and investigate sexual assaults. Rather than using the refrain "no means no," the definition of consent under the bill requires "an affirmative, conscious and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity."

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/09/29/california-bill-requiring-college-students-to-give-consent-before-sex-becomes/?cmpid=cmty_twitter_fn

 

[iHuman]

Their was no need to create a new law for this, it has been in US law since the beginning.

[Psychophant]

No could also mean, "You will pay a premium to get into these hole, so better make an offer." Some pussy beggars are willing to pay any price to cutivate their pussy addiction.

[J. D. Stembal]

Their was no need to create a new law for this, it has been in US law since the beginning.

 

Whatever pays the bills for the legislator. Specifically, the purpose of this bill is to define drunk and unconscious as states where a person, presumably the woman, cannot legally give consent. What this law means is every girl (and boy) who imbibes alcohol at a frat party is unable to grant consent for sex. It is literally the state manifestation of the feminist belief that sex under the influence is rape.