Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I take it that he's not running for president any more. Has he moved past this goal?

 

I am not sure that it is time to abandon the against me argument, which is what you would have to do if you want to pander to the masses about voluntaryism without judgement.

 

Also, why do so many libertarians and voluntaryists invoke George Orwell? Indeed, in 1984, he wanted to warn us of the dangers of the fascist totalitarian state, but Orwell was also an avowed socialist.

Posted

I like the guy. A lot actually. He's out there trying. He's talking/giving speeches/trying to move the needle and not just posting on message boards(like me). I'm sure he's flawed somewhere but that type of nitpicking can sound a little "cunty" to people on the fence. Hating on what he's doing kind of feels like the church separating into a million different denominations. It's an argument I've always used against religion. You can't even agree within your own irrationally so it looks silly from the outside. Im probably off somewhere but that's how it feels to me.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

Yes, I've been warming to Adam much more lately. He does seem to be maturing with each step he takes. I'm not convinced about NVC myself, as it can lead to a kind of moral relativism imo. But that said, it's infinitely better than the political activism that so many libertarian/anarchists engage in. So he gets a thumbs up from me.

Posted

"Sounds like a preacher to me."

agree

"I'm not convinced about NVC myself, as it can lead to a kind of moral relativism imo."

agree

 

This video makes me uncomfortable as I perceive it on some level as endorsing parts of Buddhism and promoting a pollyanna stance. Neither one of those ideas are a threat to TPTB in my opinion.

Posted

"Sounds like a preacher to me."

agree

 

"I'm not convinced about NVC myself, as it can lead to a kind of moral relativism imo."

agree

 

This video makes me uncomfortable as I perceive it on some level as endorsing parts of Buddhism and promoting a pollyanna stance. Neither one of those ideas are a threat to TPTB in my opinion.

 

I felt the same way.

 

Kokesh is a "shallow" libertarian in that he doesn't push the boundaries of philosophy and self knowledge much further than arbitrary law. I was with him until he got to how he points out that the state emotionally manipulates people (which is true) yet the whole point to he new enlightened approach is to sway people with your happy, joyful emotions. Doesn't seem universal to me.

Posted

Converts? The truth does not win converts. Politicians and preachers win converts. A scientist or a philosopher isn't worried about how many people believe his research.

 

"Fuck the numbers."

http://youtu.be/q_-18agQNwk?t=1m54s

 

Approach people with curiosity and positivity. If they continue to advocate your enslavement, then I think moral outrage is healthy. Kokesh and Buddhists are right in one thing: personal happiness and empathy is the ultimate 'fuck you' to those who do evil.

Posted

Converts? The truth does not win converts. Politicians and preachers win converts. A scientist or a philosopher isn't worried about how many people believe his research.

 

"Fuck the numbers."

http://youtu.be/q_-18agQNwk?t=1m54s

 

Approach people with curiosity and positivity. If they continue to advocate your enslavement, then I think moral outrage is healthy. Kokesh and Buddhists are right in one thing: personal happiness and empathy is the ultimate 'fuck you' to those who do evil.

 

I keep hearing this strategy more and more from the libertarian right. We've got the numbers, we just need a louder voice and more clicks on our videos.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.