Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Interesting how she considers it "chivalrous" to take a beating without retaliating. I thought chivalry implied concepts such as justice and compassion, not abject masochism and tolerance of

aggression. It's like reading Orwell.

Posted

It isn't just The View that does this thing that annoys the hell out of me where while someone is talking, they get continuously talked over. People can't make a paoint withouut being cut off or having to fight to keep talking by yelling over the other chickens squacking thier reactionary rebuttal.

 

What Whoopi is saying is essentially the non aggression principle. What the other vapid people at the table are saying is that women should be placed in a separate moral category where if you're smaller and have a vulva, you shouldn't be held liable for hitting.

 

Yay for women on a nationally televised program calling for... 'equality'.

  • Upvote 1
Posted

if you're smaller you shouldn't be held liable for hitting.

That excuse doesn't fly in kindergarten, yet when it comes to adults... If you're a small kid hitting a big kid that hits back, you're probably just not that smart.

 

If you suggest maybe adult women hitting men might not be very smart if they expect men to not hit back... Then you get shouted down

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.